Unit - Reward suggestions thread:

And if you lose, your PC goes up in flames.

Then we shall buy flame retardent PCs ;D

Or some fire extinguishers and insurance :P

Seems expensive :P

It should be less expensive than flame retardent PCs :P

But in the long run the fir extinguishers will cost more and the flame retardent PC will help it survive household fire

Insurance. The flame retardent PC will eventually melt :P

maybe we just shouldnt buy COH: Flamewar Edition ;D?

Yes agreed

We shoul just stick with standard mods like EF.

NO. STANDARD MODES NEED MOAR DAKKA!

Make fortress mode loltastic, then move on to other new modes ^^.

LOL fortress mode should have waves of zombie conscripts of devil volks :P

And the MAUS blowing up zombie conscripts for the lulz

Wait, i remember a thread on units that won't make it to ef. why exactly won't the red army have any halftracks or anything? not that i want them.

irik wrote:
Wait, i remember a thread on units that won't make it to ef. why exactly won't the red army have any halftracks or anything? not that i want them.

They MIGHT be made for other game modes but that list is of units we won't add for multiplayer armies

Really? they might make it into campaign? maybe they might make a mission in which you're trying to transport troops but all they do is die.

irik wrote:
Really? they might make it into campaign? maybe they might make a mission in which you're trying to transport troops but all they do is die.

Thought there was suppose to be a train mission like that  :P

irik wrote:
Really? they might make it into campaign? maybe they might make a mission in which you're trying to transport troops but all they do is die.

What sort of campaign mission would that be?

a suicidal one  ;D

Who knows maybe they survive :P

I will love the campaign if it meets my criteria:
1. Lots and Lots of dying
2. Long (longer than PE or british campaign)
3. lots of urban and winter missions
4. Most of all......... BERLIN!!!!!

And something unique would be nice :D Like the Maus :o

Last edited December 22, 2011 at 4:27 AM by Fishhunterx

Or T - 35

T-35 could be a demonstrating model, used its wreck to decorate the maps since a lot of it was abandoned.

Don't forget partisans. Have a partisan level.

Seeme wrote:
Don't forget partisans. Have a partisan level.

I think that's already covered(recently :)) :P.

blackbishop wrote:

Seeme wrote:
Don't forget partisans. Have a partisan level.

I think that's already covered(recently :)) :P.

That should be interesting :P. Like the US airborne mission in the beginning of the game

seriously. im seeing Operation Uranus, the one where they surrounded and recaptured the city of stalingrad.

stealthattack1 wrote:
seriously. im seeing Operation Uranus, the one where they surrounded and recaptured the city of stalingrad.

Thats seriously the name of the operation? :P Weird

'Operatsiya Uran' in Russian, not so bad :P

the burro has a point.

hello people
i want you to get new patch with new tanks usa like ram and m46 patton

:)i want to get american tanks more powerful

Being polite - First lesson:
- This is how to address people in a nice and polite way. Being polite increases your chance on being taken serious and getting what you ask for. -

1.) Don't want people to do something. Ask or beg them.
2.) Structure your posts or sentences in a way which highlights that you want to be taken serious.
3.) Never ignore simple rules of grammar, spelling and punctuation.



We won't include M46 Patton because this is a WW2 modification. You're even lucky to have the Pershing ;)

@amr
Unfortunately, our objectives are to continue support our soviet faction, balance RMC and finish Ostheer. We haven't planned to add new units for US and probably we won't.

About the M46 Patton, I think the correct mod to depict it would be the 1949 mod ;).

Last edited February 3, 2012 at 6:20 PM by blackbishop

americans are not supposed to have heavy tanks. thats just not their play style. if you want heavy armour, play as soviets or axis.

MaxiKing6 wrote:
1.) Don't want people to do something. Ask or beg them.

LOL beg is a option? Does it work ? ;D

Basiclly the US wont have any heavy tanks b/c it would do weird things to balance. Basically what stealth said.

But there is always the Sherman Jumbo :P. Always reminds me of a elephant ;D. Just check the rewards section. Its only a EF reward unit though.

It's better than demanding.

Patton wasn't put into service until the 50's... don't make me pull out the diagram! *shakes fist*

Americans also have the pershing, and with the HVAP gun it rips through tanks

Yesterday, when I was playing Soviet and call in a SU-85, I had a idea. Call-in SU-85... What about SU-100 call-in, maybe 1 or 2 SU-100 as reward units in place of IS-3 and ISU-152?
Note: this idea mostly being write here to if anybody thought about this. They could know that this idea was... (very likely) not accepted :P

^ we already have a reward unit for the ISU152, the IS3

su100 could be an upgrade for the SU85 if we get a proper model, who knows

Dann88 wrote:
Yesterday, when I was playing Soviet and call in a SU-85, I had a idea. Call-in SU-85... What about SU-100 call-in, maybe 1 or 2 SU-100 as reward units in place of IS-3 and ISU-152?
Note: this idea mostly being write here to if anybody thought about this. They could know that this idea was... (very likely) not accepted :P

Well, I think you can't have two reward units for one unit.

And didn't we used to have an SU-100? What happened to it? Unless I missed it somewhere...

Maybe we could replce the SU-85 for SU-100 and just give it weakened stats. Mainly just for eye candy :P

SU-100 was/is being considered as an individual upgun for SU-85s.

Last edited February 4, 2012 at 8:32 AM by GodlikeDennis

GodlikeDennis wrote:
SU-100 was/is being considered as an individual upgun for SU-85s.

Oh ok :P. Good to hear anywho :D. It'll be like the PE Panzer IV. Its gets an armor upgrade and a offensive upgrade :P

That's what we were thinking, although you could only get either the upgun OR the cage armour. However, the point is moot until the model is fixed and even then we need a pretty serious discussion about it.

OdinsWolfpack
Ingenery


  I find it really annoying for the soviets to have to mg. I realize they compensate in other ways ie the d28 light mgs upgrades and  hords of inf but still annoying when your tryin to hold down a side of a map in the early stages of the game. So i thought that it might be a cool idea to give them a machingun crew and use the same machingun thats in their mg dug outs. The team would have to wheel it around like the at crew does at a faster rate of course but slower than a reg mg team so there would be a draw back to it. idk jus a thought i have might give them a better chance in one on one battles and in 2v2 or 3v3 you wouldnt rely on a american teamate as much. tell me what you think 

Yeah,as a replacement for Tankhunters.

I was thinking about the soviet's favorite lend-lease tank. The M3 Stuart(Honey) as a replacement for the T-70. The trade-off would be a better chance of getting hit for better anti-infantry firepower. But what to do about the T-90?

OdinsWolfpack wrote:
  I find it really annoying for the soviets to have to mg. I realize they compensate in other ways ie the d28 light mgs upgrades and  hords of inf but still annoying when your tryin to hold down a side of a map in the early stages of the game. So i thought that it might be a cool idea to give them a machingun crew and use the same machingun thats in their mg dug outs. The team would have to wheel it around like the at crew does at a faster rate of course but slower than a reg mg team so there would be a draw back to it. idk jus a thought i have might give them a better chance in one on one battles and in 2v2 or 3v3 you wouldnt rely on a american teamate as much. tell me what you think

This was suggested many times. Soviets with mg is too strong. Same reason why soviet/US combo is imbalanced

MBJrP36 wrote:
I was thinking about the soviet's favorite lend-lease tank. The M3 Stuart(Honey) as a replacement for the T-70. The trade-off would be a better chance of getting hit for better anti-infantry firepower. But what to do about the T-90?

Why replacing a anti vehicle car for better anti infantry firepower if you just could build the T90??


Honestly i don´t think its a good idea to add any other reward unit for soviet faction. They not even have to be balanced but have to fit in a soviet design concept. In addition they have to fit in a combination with other allies.
Thats what the Jagdtiger for example lacks, because it takes the role of the Elephant. A heavy armoured tank hunter which is accurate at middle distances (compared to 88) but is slow and needs support.