Unit - Reward suggestions thread:

2 flamers, 2 ppsh, and sniper is ridiculously powerful. maybe op. But about T-35, I know it won't be in EF, but I would like it if it was. It may be able to fit in as IS-2 reward unit, or a new feature for Propaganda War Strategy or Breakthrough Assault. But, as devs said, it doesn't need to be in EF.

And another thing, I don't think tanks should be realistic because COH is not realistic. Take something like the KT for example, it was plagued with mechanical problems but it doesn't have that. Or the ISU-152, it can't really do so much to German heavy tanks anymore.

irik wrote:
... But about T-35, I know it won't be in EF, but I would like it if it was. It may be able to fit in as IS-2 reward unit, or a new feature for Propaganda War Strategy or Breakthrough Assault. But, as devs said, it doesn't need to be in EF.

22nd june, 1941 in РККА was registered 48 tanks T-35 consisting on arms. Thus only 7 cars have been lost directly in fight, 6 at the moment of the war beginning were under repair, and others 35 have left out of operation as a result of malfunctions, have broken on a march and have been thrown or destroyed by crews. :P

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2-35

Last edited November 27, 2011 at 3:00 PM by 777Mais777

I remember the devs had a T 35 model once and it looked badass! But there was some animating problems with all those turrents afaik. I would love to see a T 35 ingame but problem is there isent any space for it, it would have to be squeezed into a doctrine in favor for something else.

Why would you even need a T-35, you already got the KV2, slow as hell Breakthrough tank (that for some reason is in Urban Doctrine :P) with an over-sized gun. That's pretty much the T-35 in a nutshell except the T-35 has 3 guns instead of 1. Hell that thing is about as fast as a Maus

2x PPs43, 2x Ingenery Mosins, Flamer by default (5 men). When Urban warfare is attained, option to buy either a second flamer or a spotter's Mosin-Nagant, both at the expense of one man (if upgraded at 5 men, squad UI would read 5/4). Camo in cover with reduced fal bonuses (probably 1.15 damage and accuracy in place of Fal's 1.25 multiplier), and the ability to throw either a bundled grenade or satchel charge (depending on what the devs see fit).

Thats my suggestion for it, idk what the unit is, i just scrolled over it and saw how powerful it was. Best not to pile on all those weapons and upgrades on a single squad, it makes the squad blantantly OP no matter how high of a cost you give to the unit.

neosdark wrote:
Why would you even need a T-35, you already got the KV2, slow as hell Breakthrough tank (that for some reason is in Urban Doctrine :P) with an over-sized gun. That's pretty much the T-35 in a nutshell except the T-35 has 3 guns instead of 1. Hell that thing is about as fast as a Maus

The concept of a T-35 is pretty awesome. There is no superheavy infantry only tank ingame, making it very unique. Who wouldent like to see that big tin-can drive around shooting in every direction with shitloads of turrents ROFL POPZ (not taking balance into account) But as i said there isent any space for it, IF the t-35 would be present ingame it would  have to be squeezed into a doctrine in favor for something else, or as a reward unit (which might end up sucking hard) I don't even think its possible for the modders to get a T 35 tank ingame, "hell" it would require too much work and reconstruction of the current doctrines.

Replace either the IS-3 or KV-2? IS it possible to make a limit of 2 call-ins ???

Either IS-2 or KV-2. T-35 =/= IS-3

Fishhunterx wrote:
Replace either the IS-3 or KV-2? IS it possible to make a limit of 2 call-ins ???

about T-35. IIRC multi-turret tanks can be animated but it takes much time and patience.
which tank it would replace depends on balancing.

about 2 call-ins. i'm not sure what you mean:
1. two tanks at a time. this would be simple (hardcap at 2).
2. like KT but but can be called twice not once. can't remember seeing it in any mod so far. might be simple to code, if not maybe this could work: giving the player 2 one-time call-ins with a hardcap on the t-35 which prevents you from calling the 2nd tank before the 1st is destroyed.

Ghost wrote:

Fishhunterx wrote:
Replace either the IS-3 or KV-2? IS it possible to make a limit of 2 call-ins ???

about T-35. IIRC multi-turret tanks can be animated but it takes much time and patience.
which tank it would replace depends on balancing.

about 2 call-ins. i'm not sure what you mean:
1. two tanks at a time. this would be simple (hardcap at 2).
2. like KT but but can be called twice not once. can't remember seeing it in any mod so far. might be simple to code, if not maybe this could work: giving the player 2 one-time call-ins with a hardcap on the t-35 which prevents you from calling the 2nd tank before the 1st is destroyed.

I mean #2. 2 one time call ins. Not sure how powerful the T-35 is so I'll leave that up to u guys :P

I think T-35 should be slow, powerful, but deadly. I think it should be somewhat frail cause it has many machine guns. Slow, weak, but deadly. KV 2 and IS-2 are better in their ways.

Well, people would start lobbying for the Maus if they saw the T-35 ingame.

Reminds me of something I did today.

What did you do today?

Tankbuster wrote:
What did you do today?

"Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"

...

;)

uhhh, whats with the confusing/double meaning riddles???

MaxiKing6 wrote:

Tankbuster wrote:
What did you do today?

"Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"

...

;)

The rocket powered fist :P

neosdark wrote:

MaxiKing6 wrote:

Tankbuster wrote:
What did you do today?

"Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"

...

;)

The rocket powered fist :P

The Egg :P, Cause I had breakfast first! ;D

T-35 was a hideous tank... it had relatively the same armour thickness as a Panzer II. If any 'multi turreted' tank was to be considered, it would be the T-28, which is essentially the same tank without the rear turrets... at least the Soviets were able to weld on a few extra plates giving later T-28 models a grand total of 80mm frontal armour.

BurroDiablo wrote:
If any 'multi turreted' tank was to be considered, it would be the T-28

Or the M3 Lee? ;D. Not sure if thats the right name :P

BurroDiablo wrote:
T-35 was a hideous tank...

you have a point there. and why would anybody replace the IS-3 anyway?

Fishhunterx wrote:

BurroDiablo wrote:
If any 'multi turreted' tank was to be considered, it would be the T-28

Or the M3 Lee? ;D. Not sure if thats the right name :P

I guess the Soviets got Lee's/Grant's Lend Lease... I planned on making one for my Uni project, but then Skyrim happened...

It happened to many brave men Burro, I hope you don't take an arrow to the knee though :P

neosdark wrote:
I hope you don't take an arrow to the knee though :P

Oh god. My friend was just explaining that to me XD. And he wouldnt stop using it  :P

I think it was the M3 Grant.

I used to be productive like you, but then I took a Skyrim to the knee. :P

BurroDiablo wrote:
I used to be productive like you, but then I took a Skyrim to the knee. :P

This Skyrim disease is affecting many people lately :P

Thankfully I'm OK. Werewolves are immune to disease :P

But they are over vulnerable to silver bullets tho :p

Sure if you could find a sivler bullet  :P

I currently have Gears Of War disease. I just got the game thats why  ;D

What are its symptoms?

Well both diseases cause atrophy of the mind and of work ethics. It also has a tendency to make ppl angrier and more glued to the TV  :P

In other words you mean Zombies

BRAIIINSS!!!

Killar wrote:
In other words you mean Zombies

You could say that ;). If ppl addicted to xbox games are calld zombies then why not  ;D. JK

wow. where did the red army suggestions go? now its all zombies and werewolves.

REPLACE CONSCRIPTS WITH ZOMBIES.

Well they often come in hordes and you kill like 100 of them and they come back in doubled numbers so Yeah. WHY NOT?

stealthattack1 wrote:
wow. where did the red army suggestions go? now its all zombies and werewolves.

Well once someone suggest something we will talk about it and then probably get sidetracked. But untill then:

ZOMBIE CONSCRIPTS

Panzergrenadiers will kill them by just looking at them

Tankbuster wrote:
Panzergrenadiers will kill them by just looking at them

Indeed.

hmm. actually i dont think it would be that hard to make a zombie skin. and robotnik could POSSIBLY (if he has the time, (and wants to)) re work that one mini game about "surviving the oncoming waves" to only infanty hordes.

EDIT: that "mini game" would be fortress mode.

Last edited December 14, 2011 at 9:05 PM by stealthattack1

Or like the zombie mod. Derp :P

yea, but what about the conscripts hmm?????

They will be replaced by better units. We won't miss them. Instead of throwing Molotovs they will set themselves on fire and charge towards the Germans.

Thats kind of a cool idea  ;D. Whole new meaning to bear hug  ;D

See, I am not completely stupid.

Company of Incendiaries: Eastern Molotov.

New features include new Armor Piercing Lights Shit on Fire (APLSF) ammunition for Axis units and new co-axial and hull flamethrowers for Tigers.

V1's now leave a map-wide incendiary wake.

MG42s are 45-range flamethrowers.

::)

LOL all soldiers are equipped with flame nades. But as we wouldn't want this to be the least bit out of balance (durp) PE flame nades and Schiwwm incendiary attack do extra dmg  ;D