Unit - Reward suggestions thread:

I believe Otto only has access to the coding section of the Dev forum

Walki wrote:
Otto please keep unpublished Ostheer things in the Devforum..

#post deleted

WAAAAH :'(

Sorry guys I fucked up.

Well, usually when somebody suggests something that's in and we don't want to confirm it, we either sit quiet or we jump in and say 'What the fuck, are you stupid? Get out of here and don't come back you loathsome smelling byproduct of animal buggery.'
Ah, guess we took the high road on this one.

Nothing Otto wrote revealed something about Ostheer... or at least the original text I read and IIRC that comment wasn't edited by Otto adding more info in the next five minutes he posted it... so I think Walki overreacted a bit XD.

:(? I guess I was drunk the last evenings :P.

I'd be drunk all the time too if I lived in Riesling country :P

Gentlemen, Perhaps we should move this to the private section. I am happy to submit to chastisement for poor judgement. It is only fair after all. I don't think dirty laundry is best aired out on the front porch... If you understand my meaning.

No I don't take your meaning :P .What did you write exactly BTW?

somthing that was deleted for security reasons. i suggest we all abandon thread untill somthing relevant to the topic comes out.

Not gonna happen tankbuster

Tankbuster wrote:
No I don't take your meaning :P .What did you write exactly BTW?

What Otto did was he accidentially talked about Ostheer on this thread. However that type of stuff was meant for the Dev forum. So he deleted it. And Otto means that he wants them to end conversations about this mistake. Thats all :P

This is no longer relevant to the thread. Changing topic in 5... 4... 3... 3... 3... *clunk* 2... 1... NOW!

Here some suggestions, i made some new things using old stuff and some comunity models.
Isu-152 update with panther decals, su-57 and i replace zis-2 gun model for zis gun 3, i think this model is better. :P

Good work, but I don't understand ISU-152 pic, what's the difference?

The tree branches attached to the front and sides :).

Desert_Fox wrote:
Good work, but I don't understand ISU-152 pic, what's the difference?

Look front and sides i add mr. scruff panther decals(camo fooliage).
Here you can see better.

hernan wrote:

Desert_Fox wrote:
Good work, but I don't understand ISU-152 pic, what's the difference?

Look front and sides i add mr. scruff panther decals(camo fooliage).
Here you can see better.

Ok all clear.  :) I thought that the foliage was a tree of the map break down by ISU-152.  :P

stealthattack1 wrote:
somthing that was deleted for security reasons. i suggest we all abandon thread untill somthing relevant to the topic comes out.

KCH with Flammenwerfers. Discuss.

it's not as OP as it sounds, but I like that idea

irik wrote:
it's not as OP as it sounds, but I like that idea

It's pretty OP. Flames ignore armor so it's a counter to elite infantry. Elite infantry like KCH with anti-elite infantry weapons in hand will just rape everything.

I think it was a joke Cranial. I want the ZiS 3 after the Gunnery veterans upgrade.

That doesn't make much sense because if memory serves, ZiS-3 was more of a "Do-Everything, but Nothing Perfectly" weapon and became useless when Tigers and Panther appeared on the battlefield. The ZiS-2 was brought back into production because of that and with its long 57mm barrel it could penetrate the Tiger and Panther more efficiently.

Thus, the ZiS-3 should be pre-upgrade and ZiS-2 should be post-upgrade (and if memory serves that is how it is at the moment)

isn't it 47mm?

57-mm anti-tank gun model 1941 (ZiS-2) is the original official designation for the ZiS-2

If the model were made, the ZiS-3 would be the basic weapon and upgrade to ZiS-2.

The KCH with flamethrowers. If we change them so they aint KCH but something differant. Still good but not the like elite infantry armour of the KCH? Would it be okey then? :>

I don't know if this issue requires a replay but I just state it out here, it's the discipline ability of the Shtrafbats, which is suppose to break suppression and it does. But instead keep the squad running when activate, it makes the squad stand up when being pin for a moment and then they are pinned again.

T-26 to replace the t-70. They were used quite a bit by the soviets and can be like Greyhound vs Staghound of the americans.

Drokslit wrote:
T-26 to replace the t-70. They were used quite a bit by the soviets and can be like Greyhound vs Staghound of the americans.

+1 !
I hate the t-70 ;C

T-26 was a snail compared to the Greyhound... and about as well armored.

That's ok. We'll make it just like the Greyhound. Except with KT speed.

KT with destroyed engine speed. Just to troll redguard

Hate to break it to you, but if you don't like the T-70, you'll absolutely hate the T-26. It is slower, less armored, and packs a weaker punch.

A little note to the devs. Why does the in-game T-70 not have a coaxial MG? That always bugged me. It had one IRL, and NOT having one makes it very difficult to use against infantry with any effect.

I think Sommarkatze hates the T-70 in an Axis player way, that is, it's a decent harassment vehicle and should be nerfed beyond reason. :P No coax mg is just an error on the side of whoever animated it, there's probably no marker for the coax MG on the model. Not to worry, we'll fix that in time.

BurroDiablo wrote:
I think Sommarkatze hates the T-70 in an Axis player way, that is, it's a decent harassment vehicle and should be nerfed beyond reason. :P No coax mg is just an error on the side of whoever animated it, there's probably no marker for the coax MG on the model. Not to worry, we'll fix that in time.

Should have a co-axial maxim.  8)

Trooper425 wrote:
It had one IRL, and NOT having one makes it very difficult to use against infantry with any effect.

It shouldn´t have a MG at all. Maybe it will get nerfed against infantry. Its still too accurate. The T90 is the vehicle to go for if you want AI capacity.

I think they want it for ascetics rather than AI power

Sir wrote:
I think they want it for ascetics rather than AI power

Ah ok then i misunderstood. As long as there comes no bullet out of the mg im happy :)

or bullets like the coax mgs of other tanks.

Like the Sherman coaxial MG which does almost no dmg, just looks cool :P

I think every coaxial MG in coh its just there for looks. They seem to fire blanks or something XD
And Burro is right, I dont like it in a axis player perspective. Its devastating against PE and all of their AT misses the damn thing XD

Sir wrote:
I think they want it for AI power rather than ascetics

Fixed. Again, not a serious suggestion.

Guys, in this image, I find this some what interesting about the ability of indirect fire of the SU-76 SPG although this ability of the 76 mm gun was considered ineffective at range but it could serve as a short-medium artillery and I see relic did a good thing about realism. I wonder if this could violate to the balance of the mod, and if it is causing no harm, could you add it ?

The SU-76 doesn't have that role in the EF Soviets. He is purely a tank hunter and Soviets have other arty options.

it woud be like a mini ISU if it took place. would give ppl like GLD nightmares

The problem is that change will make the devs have more work to do which they already have much to do.

Personally I would like the IS-2 to replace the IS-3 and the IS-1 (or IS-85 if you prefer) to take its place. The only real problem with it is that we no longer have a big enough gun to take on Panthers which means almost everyone will go Breakthrough to get IS-2.

The IS-1 would be too powerful to replace the T-34/85. It is fairly fast and has a ridiculous amounts of armor for a medium tank, thus making it more of a heavy tank but lacking the super-powered main gun. It may be able to replace the IS-2 though, at least early on.

If we perhaps made an upgrade akin to the T-34 upgun for the IS-1 to go to the IS-2 then that would make sense, but then it would be ridiculous to get the IS-2 out on the battlefield, so nobody would get it and instead go Breakthrough to get the IS-3, or go to Propaganda and get Katyushas.

who said that the is3 will stay as powerfull as it is in the current version?

in the internal versin the isu152 is already a much better tank (at least this tank got some very good changes) so you should wait for the next patch :D

can haz?