EFEastern Front Forum Archive
Read-only public archive · no login or tracking

Locked topic · 181 posts

Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Eastern Front

#25199

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

In fact, freedom is strange thing. You do not have enough of its usually only when you rebel.

SS Galizien, UPA, RONA etc.
Yes, I admit, it was stupid to fight against all, or to cooperate with the Germans, as well as denying a huge part of own history and exploits of ancestors from the Army Ludowa. Who did liberate Gdansk?
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin
Forum post image
#25203

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

It's fascinating how the old War propaganda is still in circulation today.

After all, people still speak about "Liberation" rather than "Conquest", despite it being just that...
The fundamental problem of Democracy is that the majority of voters are idiots fueled by uninformed rage - and the Politicians do everything to cater to them.
#25207

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Who did liberate Gdansk?

Actually Gdańsk WAS a German city. So it's hard to say that it was liberated :)
Forum post image
Forum post image
#25210

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

I think so too, but thought that Poles have an opposite point of view. Ok, Poles from the First Polish Army captured Danzig. ^_^
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin
Forum post image
#25319

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

roxxell wrote:
British haven't saw how fascist burn whole villages to the ashes. USA haven't saw how peoples just dies because there is nothing to eat. Only USSR have saw this. Only the USSR fought on their motherland. And that why they are heroes.

Stalin = Hitler. That was most powerful propaganda ever. Clear your minds from cold war information.
My grandmother have lived in USSR. And when she talks with me - she never complaint about their life. "Life in USSR was great" - she says. And my mother thinks so too. So where is the problem? My relatives and relatives of my friends have never complaint about communism.
P.S I can give you a link, but it's on russian.
http://historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000074/st032.shtml
There is lot of intersting things. With links on sources.

http://czolg.blox.pl/2009/02/Mark-Solonin-22-czerwca-1941-czyli-jak-zaczela.html
Heres a link to a book that is in Polish (translated from Russian) "22 june 1941 - how the great patriotic war started".
Its about the first 3 months of axis-USRR fighting.
It explanes why russians lost (surrendered or deserted) more
man and equipment than all allied armies in France in 1940.
Sołomin sais that soviets dindnt want to fight for Stalin becouse of what happened in the early 30s (backing it up with 500 pages of facts).
Millions! of people died in hunger while Stalin exported food outside USRR (to buy technology and build heavy industry).
In 1933 cannibalism was a fact in Ukraine - granary of Europe!
All of that to show the soviets how cruel will the Stalin be to any of his enemies (political or military).

Old people will allways tell you that their life was better when they were young. Even if they had no free speech, there was not enough toilet paper produced and you needed to wait for 5 years to buy a car.
(Im from a post communist state, so I know how it was)
#25366

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

you needed to wait for 5 years to buy a car

Optimistic point of view if it goes to Poland ;) But who cares about cars! At least we were happy and free thanks to the Soviets!

Cheers!
Forum post image
Forum post image
#25508

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

:o

I'm shocked about the pure mass of soviet propaganda still being in the heads of an unbelievable amount of people, even today.
Is this really Wikipedia.org?  :o

QuoteWe're talking about if Europe should be thankful to the USSR. And in my opinion - it should not. Because Soviets did not bring freedom to the eastern Europe - but as you said, they brought a new regime.

Nothing to add.
In memoriam MrScruff
The Wehrmacht in the East

Obstheer FTW!
#25520

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Aouch wrote:
:o

I'm shocked about the pure mass of soviet propaganda still being in the heads of an unbelievable amount of people, even today.
Is this really Wikipedia.org?  :o

This is really Wikipedia.org.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Насилие_в_отношении_мирного_населения_Германии_(1945)
I'm shocked about the pure mass of the Cold War and the new post-soviet eastern propaganda being in the heads of an unbelievable amount of people. ::)

The Famine was (although it is not genocide against a particular nation). The Great Purge was. I'm not saying that the USSR was holy/saint, but I deny some exaggerations, that are beneficial to young post-Soviet states, and were beneficial to the West during the Cold War.
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin
Forum post image

Last edited February 1, 2010 at 3:51 PM by UeArtemis

#25552

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

I'm not saying that the USSR was holy/saint,

Sure - it's just like calling mass murderer a holy person.

I'm shocked about the pure mass of the Cold War and the new post-soviet eastern propaganda being in the heads of an unbelievable amount of people.

I think that that all those people in the mass graves scattered all around the former Soviet Union are shocked as well.

Once again:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katy%C5%84_massacre
Forum post image
Forum post image

Last edited February 1, 2010 at 5:34 PM by spanishfly

#25598

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Once again:
UeArtemis wrote:
Yes, we shot the Polish officers, shot own people, but Communists were not idiots.

And:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khatyn_massacre
We too have suffered in those times.
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin
Forum post image

Last edited February 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM by UeArtemis

#25767

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

We too have suffered in those times.

I've never said that Ukrainians and Russians did not suffered.
As I said - I respect all victims of the II World War - no matter what was their nationality.

What we must agree UeArtemis - that Poland, Ukraine, Bielarus and eastern Germany saw the REAL II World War. The things that French or Americans saw was nothing to the cruelty of the war in the eastern Europe.

We were the nations who fought Germans from the very begining of the II World War (many Ukrainians and Belarussians were in the polish army - often as officers).

In Poland you can still find the effects of the II WW. You can find destroyed buildings in Warsaw:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/Uprising_bank_polski.jpg

You can meet people who saw how Germans were burining down enitre villiges.

Forum post image
Forum post image
#27446

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Joseph Stalin Pure Evil
The end of the video is interesting. A map of slave labor camps in USRR.

Post Merge: [time]1265882999[/time]

spanishfly wrote:
Who did liberate Gdansk?

Actually Gdańsk WAS a German city. So it's hard to say that it was liberated :)

Im a Pole.
Gdańsk is a Polish name, Danzig is in German.
Before 1939 it was a free city. Not Polish not German. Before the partition of poland in 1795 it was Polish (Polond didnt exist in 1795-1918). Till 1918 too many germans were living in Gdańsk (and too many Poles to) to make it a territory of 1 country.
Since 1945 when Stalin moved all of Eastern Europes borders ~200km west. Its now considered a Polish city (like most of East Prussia). But Konigsberg (olso Eats Prussia) is now Russian a naval and army base.

Last edited February 11, 2010 at 10:09 AM by Paciat

#27454

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Yes, Konigsberg=Kaliningrad was a part of Eastern Prussia.
Forum post imageAs far as I know, all borders after the war were made along ethnic lines, except German. East Prussia was donated to Poland.
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin
Forum post image

Last edited February 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM by UeArtemis

#27456

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

UeArtemis wrote:
Yes, Konigsberg=Kaliningrad was a part of Eastern Prussia.
Forum post imageAs far as I know, all borders after the war were made along ethnic lines, except German. East Prussia was donated to Poland.

Where do you think all the Poles that are now living on German land came from?
Allmost half of Poland was donated to Ukraine, Bielorussia, Lithuania - soviet states.
#27469

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

In fact, it were not Polish lands, but territories what were conquered in the Soviet-Polish and Ukrainian-Polish wars.
Forum post image
In the picture are Belarus torn between Polish and Russian.
Forum post imagethe map of all UNR. The red lines show parts and borders.

I'm not saying that all territory on the map should be German, but all Prussia is not Polish for me.

As far as I know, after the war was a great migration of nations. For example, all Qirims ("Crimean Tatars") were taken from the Crimea. Germans from Prussia were taken too.
Forum post image
It is good ethnic map. Here you can see real ethnic polish lands.
P.S. I am not an anti-polish fanatic. For example, I do not think that Crimea is an Ukrainian land. Just would be good if countries had borders corresponding ethnic lines.
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin
Forum post image

Last edited February 12, 2010 at 10:34 AM by UeArtemis

#27518

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

For me, even if not 2 but 20 millions of german females were raped to death by our soldiers in 45 - that was not enough to revenge for all that axis done with my country.

We left germans theyr lifes AFTER ALL THAT THEY DONE WITH US - and they must thank us. SAme as Western Allyes, because we had most of Wehrmacht fighting against us, not them.
-------------------
94th Guards Infantry Division, 100th Separated Anti-Tank Artillery Divizion.
#27552

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Look at the current state of all easter european states that have been under the iron curtain of the USSR.
They r u a bunch of crap shitholes (i live in one of them ) thanks to the USSR..go fu*k yourselves all USSR acolytes . It is people that think like you who made these atrocities.

Last edited February 12, 2010 at 1:11 PM by Vio88mm

#27576

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

It is good ethnic map. Here you can see real ethnic polish lands.

It's a language map not an ethnic map. And it's a huge difference.

P.S. I am not an anti-polish fanatic. For example, I do not think that Crimea is an Ukrainian land. Just would be good if countries had borders corresponding ethnic lines

As there are no ukrainians there novadays ;) Only Russian fleet...and Russian propaganda.

---------------------------------------------------------
You had your vision of polish borders few years ago and it looked like that:

http://www.culls-page.de/WW%20II%20Karten/Second_world_war_europe_1940_map_de.png

That would be perfect, nah? :)
It's a shame that Soviets and Germans broke their alliance...they were such a nice couple.

Atak Sowiecki 1939 (German and Soviet friends 1939)
Forum post image
Forum post image

Last edited February 12, 2010 at 3:49 PM by spanishfly

#27583

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

There was no alliance and they certainly weren't "friends". Since the Western powers refused to commit to a real fight against Nazi Germany, Stalin wasn't going to let Hitler take all of Poland and be 100s of KM closer to Soviet borders. It sucks for Poland but they were in the wrong place at the wrong time so to speak.

Some people parade that Nazi-Soviet pact around as if both powers had some sort of hard-on for Poland but in reality neither the Nazis or Soviets really cared about Poland itself, they just wanted a buffer zone while each of them did their thing (Hitler got to focus on France and Stalin got to focus on modernizing his army).
Forum post image

Last edited February 12, 2010 at 5:31 PM by thebomb

#27587

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

spanishfly wrote:

That would be perfect, nah? :)
It's a shame that Soviets and Germans broke their alliance...they were such a nice couple.



Its a shame that Germans and Poles broke that alliance after Poland got a meatloaf from Chechoslovakia. They were such a good couple. BTW Poles asked to Hitler to have military alliance, to attack USSR together.
-------------------
94th Guards Infantry Division, 100th Separated Anti-Tank Artillery Divizion.
#27588

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

BTW Poles asked to Hitler to have military alliance, to attack USSR together.

Lol - proof please. Who asked? When? Because I heard that Stalin asked Martians to have such alliance as well. Here is the proof:

http://www.busygamer.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/stalinvsmartians_icon2.jpg

(Unfortunately Martians broke the negotiations).

Everyone - let's give our friend Artillerist a big "bravo" for his idea of polish-german pact - the greatest political fiction of all time! Bravo!

Its a shame that Germans and Poles broke that alliance after Poland got a meatloaf from Chechoslovakia

Show me all those Polish-German military parades in Chechoslovakia.

There was no alliance and they certainly weren't "friends".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact

Say "cheese":

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/Armia_Czerwona%2CWehrmacht_23.09.1939_wsp%C3%B3lna_parada.jpg

:D

1940 - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-1984-1206-523%2C_Berlin%2C_Verabschiedung_Molotows.jpg

Once again - Big thanks for the II World War to Germans and Soviets ;)
Forum post image
Forum post image

Last edited February 12, 2010 at 6:23 PM by spanishfly

#27604

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

The fact that Soviet and German military officials conducted a joint parade while giving each other reach-arounds doesn't mean anything. The pact was a way for both leaders to buy time before they inevitably come to each others' throats.

Also, Stalin approached the Western powers first in the hope of making a formal deal with them to stop Hitler. But after Poland refused Soviet troops and Belgium refused French troops, Stalin took his business elsewhere because the Western powers weren't serious about stopping Hitler - so he made the pact with Hitler to buy himself some time. He didn't have a choice..otherwise like I said he'd be sharing a border with Germany a few hundred kilometers closer to Moscow.

In any event the two systems were far too opposed ideologically (they were on opposite ends of the spectrum) so it's pretty obvious that there could be no friendship.
Forum post image

Last edited February 12, 2010 at 8:36 PM by thebomb

#27607

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Artillerist wrote:
spanishfly wrote:

That would be perfect, nah? :)
It's a shame that Soviets and Germans broke their alliance...they were such a nice couple.



Its a shame that Germans and Poles broke that alliance after Poland got a meatloaf from Chechoslovakia. They were such a good couple. BTW Poles asked to Hitler to have military alliance, to attack USSR together.
Yes, I read about a Polish-German cooperation.
QuoteIt's a language map not an ethnic map. And it's a huge difference.
In fact, not huge. It coincides with the ethnic maps in the 85-99%
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin
Forum post image

Last edited February 12, 2010 at 9:04 PM by UeArtemis

#27609

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Stalin approached the Western powers first in the hope of making a formal deal with them to stop Hitler. But after Poland refused Soviet troops and Belgium refused French troops, Stalin took his business elsewhere because the Western powers weren't serious about stopping Hitler

Because for Poland or other Western countries Soviets were just the same threat as Hitler. The moment Polish government would allow the Soviet Army to enter Poland - it would be the end of freedom in Poland.

Yes, I read about a Polish-German cooperation.

Lol - so read more ;) There were no such cooperation from the polish side. Both Japanese and German suggestions were declined by the polish foreign minister. There were no plans of invasion on USSR in Poland.

And when you're trying to compare polish actions in Czechoslovakia and Soviet invasion of Poland in 1939, try to compare the results of both those actions. Try to count the victims of polish rule in Cieszyn (mainly inhabited by Poles) and the Soviet aggression on "Kresy" in 1939. 

In fact, not huge. It coincides with the ethnic maps in the 85-99%

Source? If novadays, most of Belarussians speaks Russian....than it means that the nation do not exist?

Forum post image
Forum post image

Last edited February 12, 2010 at 9:15 PM by spanishfly

#27612

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

The map of the times of the 19th century. In that time villagers speak their native language, and most of lower classes in towns. In those days there were many illiterates, who were not teach from childhood to speak the language of the metropolis and there was no mass media. So this is the correct map.

More detailed answer I am going to give you later. Now is night. Good night.
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin
Forum post image

Last edited February 12, 2010 at 9:44 PM by UeArtemis

#27699

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

QuoteFor me, even if not 2 but 20 millions of german females were raped to death by our soldiers in 45 - that was not enough to revenge for all that axis done with my country.

We left germans theyr lifes AFTER ALL THAT THEY DONE WITH US -

artillerist,remember there was a war before ww2, called ww1?
in this war the RUSSIANS came first over the borders to germany in 1914. Germans hadn´t done ANY warcrimes to russians before but when your army came to eastern prussia you started rapping and killing our women. some of your artillery-battalions run out of ammunition while shooting into fleeing civilians.

so after all- you make me say something i´ve never said before: it was good  from Hitler to attack Russia and killing all those people, because Russians deserve nothing else like that




and now tell me what do you think of mine now? i know it: " this fucking fritz is talking bullsh*t , he´s a fucking Nazi , my opinion is the only one which is right."  don´t you?
because i thought nearly the same when i read your comment. ( just exchange fritz with Ivan and Nazi with communist). but very soon i calmed down and asked myself why do you hate us Germans so much? the times that Russians and Germans were enemys are long gone- and we Germans don´t  feel  much hate against Russia. By the way: the only reason why i´ve written:
Quoteit was good  from Hitler to attack Russia and killing all those people, because Russians deserve nothing else like that
  was that i wanted you to feel the way i feel when i read your posts.
Couse every time i read your comments i feel a big hate against communism, Russia , the red army and all the things you stand  for.
#27707

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Ok, lets calm down.

1. I dont hate GERMANS. I really have lots of exellent friends from Germany. Grandfather of Steffan,m one of my best friends, flew from here, from Stalingrad without legs in january 1943, on the last Ju52 escaped from Stalingrad. And My grangrandfather fought directly here, and was heavy wounded in october. MAY BE by fire of Steffan's grandfather. But we are still very good friends.
I hate nazists and NEO NAZISts. By "neo nazists" I mean not only all those who hail now "we were fight for the hitler and we proud of that" (like lots of traitors of Estonia, Lithuania, UNA/UPa nd Vlasov division), but all thouse who claim USSR as a "equal evil as hitleer's Germany"!

2. Yes, I remember that war, wich was started by germans, and I know abiut retreat of russians all the tuime, and I know that the only success was a Brusilov's attack raid just before russian capitulation just before revolution. I dont know about any russian actions in Eastern Prussia, because all Polish lands and Baltic land were occupied by germans extremly soon after war started. And hundreds of officers, originally with german roots, traited russian army, and surrendered with all their regiments.

3. My opinion is not "the last truth" here. Its just my opinion, nothing more.

4. I am not a communist at all. I know about crimes of communists against my OWN NATION not from propaganda books, but from my grandies. I think, if You in the West will hear about "death-deserve crime" if somebody will JUST stole several grains to feed his family and be shot for it by commisars - You will laugh or wont beleive. But it was truth. Mother of my grandfather, together with 3/4 of his village in southern siberia - died from hunger in late 30'th, because commisars took all the food (some of that food were sold to germany too, in exchange to factory equipment and other technology). People had to boil grass and even boots to eat it, just to survive! Dont tell me what is communism!

"Когда я слышал их (комиссаров) призывы: «За Сталина!», то мне было трудно сдерживать мат. Никто не воевал лично за Сталина! Народ воевал против Гитлера! Люди воевали за свою землю! И мстили за своих убитых братьев, повешенных матерей, расстрелянных детей и изнасилованных жён!"
That was a words of one artillery officer, who recalled his WWII actions. And he was not the only who think that way.

Hitler was not going only to take our land and our houses. He was going to eleminate slavians as a nation, with last few people as a slaves. Read "Fall Ost" carefully. He declared a total war, annihilation war. Hitler declared it, not Stalin, note that! He failed to do that, and what do You waiting from Soviet soldiers who killed their hatred enemy in Berlin? And even in That situation, Stalin ORDERED not to rape and maradeur, and there were hundreds of soviet soldiers were judged and shot because of ignoring that order. Stalin KNEW how to rule.

During WWII, communism was a biggest enemy for SOVIET Army itself.
After WWII, communism became an evil for eastern Europe.

Dont exchange that in your mind.

Post Merge: [time]1266086781[/time]

And few words about soviet "invasion" into Poland in 1939.

Soviet attack was totally unwaited to Hitler. He didnt knew about Stalins plans over eastern Poland (very strange for "good allies", isnt it?). Only after two days passed, Stalin and Hitler had a discussion about new border between Germany and USSR. And only on 20th, when Stalin PRESSED Htiler to move new border as Stalin wants (with Brest on Soviet side), border was stated by both leaders. Under soviet press, on sept.20 Hitler ordered to retreat his troops from positions they gained in fight with poles with much blood, and evaquate all tropheys or destroy them not only to be captured by soviets. When after actions ceased, Hitler asked to give him Belostok and Augustov because Germany have lack of wood, and it extremly need with forrested territory, Stalin answerred in the way as "F*ck off, Its now Ukrainian SSR". An "exellent friendlyship", isnt it?

But during actions on sept. 17 several RedArmy VVS bomb attacks followed on german troops, in wich were killed up to 10 german soldiers.
On sept. 19, near Lvov recoon armed cars of 24 light tank brigade  met german troops of 137 Inf.Division, and after following COMBAT RedArmy lost 3 BA-10, 5 soldiers killed and 3 injured. Germans lost 2 AT guns and several soldiers killed.

Stalin played his own game, as master of puppets, and Hitler was a puppet in 1939  in front of the RedArmy fiorce.
-------------------
94th Guards Infantry Division, 100th Separated Anti-Tank Artillery Divizion.

Last edited February 13, 2010 at 6:46 PM by Artillerist

#27719

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

QuoteOk, lets calm down.

good idea ;)

QuoteI dont hate GERMANS.

and i don´t hate russians, one of my best friends is a semi-russian

QuoteYes, I remember that war, wich was started by germans, and I know abiut retreat of russians all the tuime, and I know that the only success was a Brusilov's attack raid just before russian capitulation just before revolution. I dont know about any russian actions in Eastern Prussia, because all Polish lands and Baltic land were occupied by germans extremly soon after war started. And hundreds of officers, originally with german roots, traited russian army, and surrendered with all their regiments.

Reasons for ww1 were a little bit more complex.
If you say you just know about russian retreats until the Brusilow offensive then google " Battle of Tannenberg" or something like that.
And could you explain why whole regiments surrendered just because their officers had german roots?

QuoteI am not a communist at all. I know about crimes of communists against my OWN NATION not from propaganda books, but from my grandies. I think, if You in the West will hear about "death-deserve crime" if somebody will JUST stole several grains to feed his family and be shot for it by commisars - You will laugh or wont beleive. But it was truth. Mother of my grandfather, together with 3/4 of his village in southern siberia - died from hunger in late 30'th, because commisars took all the food (some of that food were sold to germany too, in exchange to factory equipment and other technology). People had to boil grass and even boots to eat it, just to survive! Dont tell me what is communism!


First of all: i feel sorry for your mother´s grandmother and her village. In western Europe we don´t laugh about such stories and we believe them.

Quote"Когда я слышал их (комиссаров) призывы: «За Сталина!», то мне было трудно сдерживать мат. Никто не воевал лично за Сталина! Народ воевал против Гитлера! Люди воевали за свою землю! И мстили за своих убитых братьев, повешенных матерей, расстрелянных детей и изнасилованных жён!"

Excuse me, but i neither understand the russian language nor can i read Cyril

QuoteSoviet attack was totally unwaited to Hitler. He didnt knew about Stalins plans over eastern Poland (very strange for "good allies", isnt it?). Only after two days passed, Stalin and Hitler had a discussion about new border between Germany and USSR. And only on 20th, when Stalin PRESSED Htiler to move new border as Stalin wants (with Brest on Soviet side), border was stated by both leaders. Under soviet press, on sept.20 Hitler ordered to retreat his troops from positions they gained in fight with poles with much blood, and evaquate all tropheys or destroy them not only to be captured by soviets. When after actions ceased, Hitler asked to give him Belostok and Augustov because Germany have lack of wood, and it extremly need with forrested territory, Stalin answerred in the way as "F*ck off, Its now Ukrainian SSR". An "exellent friendlyship", isnt it?


search in googel for Hilter-Stalin-pact or Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. You say Stalin didn´t gave Hitler wood? ok... Hilter attcked Russia with Stalin´s oil. Which takes me to the last point:

QuoteStalin played his own game, as master of puppets, and Hitler was a puppet in 1939  in front of the RedArmy fiorce.


There is something you maybe don´t know: Hitler wanted the war with russia a very long time ago. you can find proofs for this in his book "Mein Kampf". And if Hitler was a puppet of Stalin than i have to ask: why couldn´t Stalin´s army stop the Whermacht until the winter came?
#27765

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Soviet attack was totally unwaited to Hitler. He didnt knew about Stalins plans over eastern Poland

Just as Der Deutsche said - Ribbentrop - Molotov Pact. I'm not suggesting that Hitler and Stalin were "pals". I'm just saying that Hitler and Stalin worked together for a long time ;)

Napaść na Polskę
-----------------------------------------------------------

And once again - I don't understand WHY should we think, that Hitler was worse than Stalin. They were just the same - the only difference is that one of them won the war. That's all.
Forum post image
Forum post image

Last edited February 14, 2010 at 12:47 AM by spanishfly

#27776

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

QuoteExcuse me, but i neither understand the russian language nor can i read Cyril

"When I've heard commisars calling "For the Stalin!", it was extremly hard for me to stop "f*ck" words from my mouth. Nobody fought for Stalin! People fought against Hitler! They fought for their land! And vengeaged for their killed brothers, hanged mothers, shot children and raped wifes!"
Quote" Battle of Tannenberg"

Yes, as I've sayd - another stupid attack without any success, resulting losing thousands of soldiers and huge retreat.
Quote"Mein Kampf"

I know what it is about :) And Stalin knew that Hitler is going to attack him. But he didnt knew that attack will start so soon, in june 41.
Quote why couldn´t Stalin´s army stop the Whermacht until the winter came?

Actually, the first defeat of Wehrmacht, when it was stopped, was in november at Rostov. And at Moskow, Wehrmacht was stopped all over the front by first time from the beginning of the war.
-------------------
94th Guards Infantry Division, 100th Separated Anti-Tank Artillery Divizion.
#28059

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

leo.civil.uefs wrote:
I was playing Men of War: Red Tide, and I saw the registers of Alexander Zorich...

Looks like we in west know only a little or nothing about WW2... I mean... majority of people are too retarded by Hollywood and American/British propaganda.

Most people dont know much about the participation of USSR in WW2... specially in USA (Americans really think they were the winners of WW2 and defeated Hitler,  ;D)


Thanks.  Screw you, too.  Most of us don't think that at all.

leo.civil.uefs wrote:There is some facts that cannot be denied..

85% of the nazi army was defeated in USSR.

The imense majority of the german army was used to exterminate USSR. (Read Mein Kampf, by Hitler). Hitler was obcecated in destroying USSR and kill every people in.


Most of that 85% was defeated by the Russian winter combined with Hitler's incompetence as a commander.

leo.civil.uefs wrote:Im not underestimating the participation of British and Americans (That last fought in 2 front at the same time!) in WW2, you also were Heroes but, lets be honest, WW2 was 70% about HItler x Stalin.


More random percentages that you pulled out of your ass?

leo.civil.uefs wrote:America was waching two of his enemies destroying each other.


The Cold War wasn't on the horizon until 1944/1945.

leo.civil.uefs wrote:All that shit about D day... the war was already over in D day, Stalingrad was before D day, Kursk was before D day...

D day has only one objective, prevent the soviets from advancing in europe until Portugal, D day was the first day of cold war.


It wasn't about liberating France and preventing Germany from conquering the British Empire (the only thing standing between Hitler and the United States)?  Like I said, the Cold War didn't start until '45.

leo.civil.uefs wrote:Ok, thats too much to be discussed and I bet there is a lot of opinios around.

One thing is true, the Soviets Defeated Hitler, I say Soviets and not only Russians because there is a lot of other folks who did a big sacrifice in WW2 (25 million people dead in all USSR)


True.

leo.civil.uefs wrote:Lets also not forget the Chinese exterminaiton by the Japaneses (16 million death).


How exactly is this relevant?

leo.civil.uefs wrote:Its a pity that there is all that propaganda trying to dirty the image of the Russian leaders and people.

Today we are about to play a Game mod created by Germans, Americans, British and other people... thats freedom, and today there is freedom because million of Soviets died in the past fighting for this freedom ,they deserve respect.


I guess that's why, when the war was over, the Soviets established dozens of oppressive satellite communist states.

You really made my jaw drop here.

Millions of Soviets certainly died... but it sure wasn't for freedom.  It was for two incredibly obvious reasons.  They had no choice.  They were invaded by Nazi Germany.

Once the war was over they went back to being oppressed by Stalin.

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 2:13 AM by pnoozi

#28069

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

pnoozi wrote:

Most of that 85% was defeated by the Russian winter combined with Hitler's incompetence as a commander.


Right...I didn't know Russian winters lasted twelve months. Must be those damn commie weather changing machines!

Anyway, saying that the Soviets defeated the Wehrmacht because of weather or Hitler's incompetence is a grossly ignorant statement. There were thousands of factors that played a role, one of which was the competence and professionalism of the Soviet army. The fact that the RKKA went from a disorganized mess to the world's most powerful army is no accident - it was achieved by beating the top dog at the time - the German army.


Quote
The Cold War wasn't on the horizon until 1944/1945.



How is the Cold War relevant to this discussion? The fact that the Cold War did not start until after the war doesn't exclude the fact that the Western powers wanted the USSR bled to death.

Quote
It wasn't about liberating France and preventing Germany from conquering the British Empire (the only thing standing between Hitler and the United States)?  Like I said, the Cold War didn't start until '45.


If the US really wanted to stop Germany from conquering the British Empire then they would have done so when Britain was weakest..in 1939/40/41 not when the war was pretty much over.

Quote
I guess that's why, when the war was over, the Soviets established dozens of oppressive satellite communist states.


The Russian Empire and the Soviet Union were attacked twice in a span of two decades by the same people losing over fifty MILLION people. No one, especially Stalin, is going to be dumb enough to let that happen again. It sucks for Eastern Europe but Stalin wasn't going to risk ANOTHER invasion. That is why a buffer zone and satellite states were established. Stalin wasn't even a fan of the international communism idea - that was more Lenin and Trotsky's thing.

Quote
Millions of Soviets certainly died... but it sure wasn't for freedom.  It was for two incredibly obvious reasons.  They had no choice.  They were invaded by Nazi Germany.


The Soviets were fighting for existence. I know this is a hard concept for some people to understand (especially in the West, which never had to fight for it) but once you start fighting for your very existence things like communism, Stalin and The Worker's Party go out the window. The Soviets were truly fighting for something of value - just like the Poles, Ukrainians, Belorussians and any other slavic people in Eastern Europe.

In any event, whatever reason the Soviets had for fighting was way more justifiable than the reason Americans had for fighting. Fighting for your very existence is something a simple farmhand will understand. Fighting for "democracy" in Europe is a much more exotic and abstract concept which probably wasn't high on any GI's priority list.
Forum post image

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 4:54 AM by thebomb

#28072

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

There were thousands of factors that played a role, one of which was the competence and professionalism of the Soviet army.

Lol? What was professional in Soviet Army? O_O I may agree that this was the biggest army...but professional...man...just no ;p

Just because Soviets were winning battles by numbers, it doesn't mean that the whole organisation was professional.
Forum post image
Forum post image

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 6:33 AM by spanishfly

#28075

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

thebomb wrote:
pnoozi wrote:

Most of that 85% was defeated by the Russian winter combined with Hitler's incompetence as a commander.


Right...I didn't know Russian winters lasted twelve months. Must be those damn commie weather changing machines!


I believe you've exposed a gap in your historical knowledge here :D

Have you ever heard of Hitler's summer pause?  Basically, during Operation Barbarossa in 1941, Hitler and his generals had trouble agreeing.  This caused their summer advance to be delayed long enough for the warm months to pass.  This pause is widely considered to be a major reason the Germans (relatively ill-equipped for harsh winter warfare) were not able to take Moscow.  This served as a great moral victory for the Russians.

Quote
Anyway, saying that the Soviets defeated the Wehrmacht because of weather or Hitler's incompetence is a grossly ignorant statement.


No more ignorant than saying the Soviets didn't need allies to win the war.  Without lend-lease and the Battle of Britain added on top of Hitler's incompetence, the Soviets lose Moscow, a defeat so demoralizing it would have been hard for the Soviets to recover.

Quote
There were thousands of factors that played a role, one of which was the competence and professionalism of the Soviet army. The fact that the RKKA went from a disorganized mess to the world's most powerful army is no accident - it was achieved by beating the top dog at the time - the German army.


Actually, the fact that the Red Army was a disorganized mess suggests something entirely different.  It suggests that they must have had some "help" in defeating Germany.

Quote
Quote
The Cold War wasn't on the horizon until 1944/1945.



How is the Cold War relevant to this discussion? The fact that the Cold War did not start until after the war doesn't exclude the fact that the Western powers wanted the USSR bled to death.


Because the OP stated that the western powers viewed Russia as an enemy... which was not the case until 1945 (the start of the Cold War) at the earliest.  And the western powers (other than Nazi Germany and Italy) wanted Russia bled to death?  Where are you getting that from?  Russia had been an ally of the western powers since WWI, and westerners didn't really start fearing socialism until the whole State Department fiasco and McCarthy.

Quote
Quote
It wasn't about liberating France and preventing Germany from conquering the British Empire (the only thing standing between Hitler and the United States)?  Like I said, the Cold War didn't start until '45.


If the US really wanted to stop Germany from conquering the British Empire then they would have done so when Britain was weakest..in 1939/40/41 not when the war was pretty much over.


So we waited until June 1941?  The Soviets initiated their invasion of Poland and the Baltic states in 1939.  If the United States was trying to stop the Soviets from advancing, why on Earth would they HELP them by opening up a second front with Germany?!  I have no doubt that had the Soviets advanced to Iberia, the western powers would have been scared, but at the time, Nazi Germany was the by far the primary threat to the US and Britain.

Quote
Quote
I guess that's why, when the war was over, the Soviets established dozens of oppressive satellite communist states.


The Russian Empire and the Soviet Union were attacked twice in a span of two decades by the same people losing over fifty MILLION people. No one, especially Stalin, is going to be dumb enough to let that happen again. It sucks for Eastern Europe but Stalin wasn't going to risk ANOTHER invasion. That is why a buffer zone and satellite states were established. Stalin wasn't even a fan of the international communism idea - that was more Lenin and Trotsky's thing.


The important part of what I wrote is not the satellite buffer zone part - it's the oppressive regime part.  The OP said the Soviets were fighting for freedom.  Sorry, just not the case.  They were fighting for oppression, because it's better to be oppressed than dead.

Quote
Quote
Millions of Soviets certainly died... but it sure wasn't for freedom.  It was for two incredibly obvious reasons.  They had no choice.  They were invaded by Nazi Germany.


The Soviets were fighting for existence. I know this is a hard concept for some people to understand (especially in the West, which never had to fight for it) but once you start fighting for your very existence things like communism, Stalin and The Worker's Party go out the window. The Soviets were truly fighting for something of value - just like the Poles, Ukrainians, Belorussians and any other slavic people in Eastern Europe.


Exactly!  They weren't fighting for freedom... that's the only point I'm trying to make.  The Soviets weren't fighting for freedom at all.  In fact, they made a pact with Hitler agreeing not to fight just so they could get a little piece of Poland.  The OP is full of it.

The United States was fighting for freedom.  The Soviets were fighting for their lives.

Quote
In any event, whatever reason the Soviets had for fighting was way more justifiable than the reason Americans had for fighting. Fighting for your very existence is something a simple farmhand will understand. Fighting for "democracy" in Europe is a much more exotic and abstract concept which probably wasn't high on any GI's priority list.


So the US should have waited for German boots to hit American soil?  Then they would have been justified?

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 7:38 AM by pnoozi

#28098

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Fighting for freedom and fighting for existance is very very different things.

You will never understand that, pnoozi.

P.S. USSR was not the only who made a pact with Hitler. Baltic countries signed same pacts (defencive pacts, to-not-attack-each-other-pact) BEFORE USSR.

P.P.S. WWII started not on 1.9.1939. It was started when Westernies treated Czechoslovakia and let Hitler occupy Austria. 1938, do You remember? And now they cry about "evil soviet unian, huh? ;) Niiiceee
-------------------
94th Guards Infantry Division, 100th Separated Anti-Tank Artillery Divizion.
#28119

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

WWII started not on 1.9.1939. It was started when Westernies treated Czechoslovakia and let Hitler occupy Austria. 1938

Says who? Do you recall any battle in Czechoslovakia od Austria? Or maybe you're talking about the political situation? Than maybe the II WW starded in 1919 after the I WW? Or maybe in 1795 when Russia, Prussia and Austria had divided Poland? Or maybe it starded in 1410 in Tannenberg?

Artillerist - once again you do not understand what you're saying. You cannot see the difference between military conflict and annexation. I suggest that you should read more or at least say smth which has any sense.

P.S. USSR was not the only who made a pact with Hitler. Baltic countries signed same pacts (defencive pacts, to-not-attack-each-other-pact) BEFORE USSR.

Once again - It's not even worth to explain you over and over again the same problem. If you do not see the difference between non aggression pacts and a plan of military conquest of another country...than I think that you really should read some books man...

Fighting for freedom and fighting for existance is very very different things.

You will never understand that, pnoozi.


Yea- because in his country people never had to fight for their freedom against those damn Soviets, ne? :)
Forum post image
Forum post image

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 6:01 PM by spanishfly

#28129

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Artillerist wrote:
Fighting for freedom and fighting for existance is very very different things.

You will never understand that, pnoozi.


Actually, that's almost exactly what I said.
#28132

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Quote
Lol? What was professional in Soviet Army? O_O I may agree that this was the biggest army...but professional...man...just no ;p


Just because Soviets were winning battles by numbers, it doesn't mean that the whole organisation was professional.


I don't know what to tell you, the results speak for themselves.

The Soviet army subscribed to the most advanced military doctrine and theory at the time.  The Soviets had a developed and focused body of knowledge and an analytical process that allowed them to quickly and effectively learn from their mistakes. For example, the failure of their attacks outside Moscow in 1941 were analyzed in detail. After they learned from their mistakes they conducted a successful operation outside Stalingrad encircling the 6th Army - one of the biggest defeats for the Germans in WWII.

The fact that the Soviet army adhered to these military principles and through trial by fire learned how to apply them enabled them to destroy the German armed forces. This shows just how much the Soviet army matured into a professional fighting force.

The fact that the Soviets had to deal with huge numbers of material and men showed how great their logistics forces were. The Soviets used all branches of their military successfully, a testament to combined arms tactics. Their tank forces were highly developed and allowed them to achieve unbelievable gains during Operation Bagration for example.

All of these results are indicative of a professional and modern fighting force. To be honest there was no other way the Soviets could have won.

Quote
Have you ever heard of Hitler's summer pause?  Basically, during Operation Barbarossa in 1941, Hitler and his generals had trouble agreeing.  This caused their summer advance to be delayed long enough for the warm months to pass.  This pause is widely considered to be a major reason the Germans (relatively ill-equipped for harsh winter warfare) were not able to take Moscow.  This served as a great moral victory for the Russians.


When the gloves are off and you're at war with someone - you do your best. Whether you made mistakes or had problems with your generals, no one cares about that. They are simply excuses. I'm sure the Soviets had plenty of problems with their generals too, or Stalin's meddling but no one uses those reasons as an excuse for their poor performance. The Germans were simply a better fighting force at that point in the war.

And your point about the summer pause...the reason there was a pause was because Hitler diverted Army Group Center to the south in order to encircle the Soviet forces at Kiev. He didn't just "pause" and sit on his thumbs - he made a decision that he thought would bring about a major loss for the Soviet army. The fact that it did not change the outcome of the war in his favor is his fault and in no way excuses the defeats that were brought about by the Soviets.

Quote
No more ignorant than saying the Soviets didn't need allies to win the war.  Without lend-lease and the Battle of Britain added on top of Hitler's incompetence, the Soviets lose Moscow, a defeat so demoralizing it would have been hard for the Soviets to recover.


No one said that the Soviets didn't need the Western powers. What you replied to was a statement that the Soviets did the majority of the fighting in the European theater...which is true. If ifs and ands were pots and pans, there'd be no work for tinkers' hands. I don't deal in "what-if" scenarios.


Quote
Actually, the fact that the Red Army was a disorganized mess suggests something entirely different.  It suggests that they must have had some "help" in defeating Germany.


They were a disorganized mess...in 1941. In 1945 they were the most powerful army in the world. This leap was achieved through four years of fighting the most powerful army at the time.


Quote
Because the OP stated that the western powers viewed Russia as an enemy... which was not the case until 1945 (the start of the Cold War) at the earliest.  And the western powers (other than Nazi Germany and Italy) wanted Russia bled to death?  Where are you getting that from?  Russia had been an ally of the western powers since WWI, and westerners didn't really start fearing socialism until the whole State Department fiasco and McCarthy.


You have a very naive view of the world. The Western powers were not a fan of the Soviet Union since it was simply another competitor. Not only that but the Soviet Union advertised a socio-economic system which empowered the worker. This was greatly feared by the ruling class in the Western world and they didn't want that propagated either in post war Europe or before then (see the First Red Scare).

Quote
So we waited until June 1941?  The Soviets initiated their invasion of Poland and the Baltic states in 1939.  If the United States was trying to stop the Soviets from advancing, why on Earth would they HELP them by opening up a second front with Germany?!


In 1941, the US did not know who was going to win the war. German victory was possible. In order to make sure that whoever wins will be at their weakest, they supported the losing side in order to bleed the other. That is why they provided help to the Soviets.

Quote
The important part of what I wrote is not the satellite buffer zone part - it's the oppressive regime part.  The OP said the Soviets were fighting for freedom.  Sorry, just not the case.  They were fighting for oppression, because it's better to be oppressed than dead.


The Soviets were fighting for freedom from German oppression. If Stalin twisted that after the war it does not change the fact that the Soviets were still fighting for freedom at the time. Yes, from a retrospective point of view a weak argument could be made that the Soviets were somehow fighting for "oppression" but again, no one thought like that at the time except maybe Stalin.

Quote
Exactly!  They weren't fighting for freedom... that's the only point I'm trying to make.  The Soviets weren't fighting for freedom at all.  In fact, they made a pact with Hitler agreeing not to fight just so they could get a little piece of Poland.  The OP is full of it.


The Soviets made a pact with Hitler after coming back from discussions with the Western powers and realizing that they were completely disinterested in actually stopping Hitler. Stalin wasn't going to dick around, his country's security was at stake and if that meant taking half of Poland to act as a buffer state...so be it.

Quote
So the US should have waited for German boots to hit American soil?  Then they would have been justified?


Uhh no..I was just explaining to you that it's much easier for a soldier to understand a concept such as fighting for your existence than it is for one to understand interventionism.
Forum post image

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 8:15 PM by thebomb

#28145

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

thebomb wrote:
Quote
Have you ever heard of Hitler's summer pause?  Basically, during Operation Barbarossa in 1941, Hitler and his generals had trouble agreeing.  This caused their summer advance to be delayed long enough for the warm months to pass.  This pause is widely considered to be a major reason the Germans (relatively ill-equipped for harsh winter warfare) were not able to take Moscow.  This served as a great moral victory for the Russians.


When the gloves are off and you're at war with someone - you do your best. Whether you made mistakes or had problems with your generals, no one cares about that. They are simply excuses. I'm sure the Soviets had plenty of problems with their generals too, or Stalin's meddling but no one uses those reasons as an excuse for their poor performance. The Germans were simply a better fighting force at that point in the war.

And your point about the summer pause...the reason there was a pause was because Hitler diverted Army Group Center to the south in order to encircle the Soviet forces at Kiev. He didn't just "pause" and sit on his thumbs - he made a decision that he thought would bring about a major loss for the Soviet army. The fact that it did not change the outcome of the war in his favor is his fault and in no way excuses the defeats that were brought about by the Soviets.


Well, Hitler's decision didn't bring about a major loss for the Soviet army, and considering he went against the strong advice of his generals, I'd consider that his fault.  Hitler is notorious for his shortcomings as a military commander.  Not Stalin...

Quote
Quote
Actually, the fact that the Red Army was a disorganized mess suggests something entirely different.  It suggests that they must have had some "help" in defeating Germany.


They were a disorganized mess...in 1941. In 1945 they were the most powerful army in the world. This leap was achieved through four years of fighting the most powerful army at the time.


They were a disorganized mess in 1941 and the Battle of Stalingrad, the turning point of the war, was in 1942.  So they went from disorganized mess to elite fighting force in one year?

Quote
Quote
Because the OP stated that the western powers viewed Russia as an enemy... which was not the case until 1945 (the start of the Cold War) at the earliest.  And the western powers (other than Nazi Germany and Italy) wanted Russia bled to death?  Where are you getting that from?  Russia had been an ally of the western powers since WWI, and westerners didn't really start fearing socialism until the whole State Department fiasco and McCarthy.


You have a very naive view of the world. The Western powers were not a fan of the Soviet Union since it was simply another competitor. Not only that but the Soviet Union advertised a socio-economic system which empowered the worker. This was greatly feared by the ruling class in the Western world and they didn't want that propagated either in post war Europe or before then (see the First Red Scare).


The deep-seeded fear of communism in the United States didn't take hold until after World War II.  Americans wouldn't have elected Roosevelt (see the New Deal) otherwise.

http://www.ushistory.org/us/49e.asp

"The Great Depression created an environment where the federal government accepted responsibility for curing a wide array of society's ills previously left to individuals, states, and local governments. This amount of regulation and involvement requires a vast upgrading of the government bureaucracy. An armada of government bureaus and regulatory agencies was erected to service the programs of the New Deal."

Quote
Quote
So we waited until June 1941?  The Soviets initiated their invasion of Poland and the Baltic states in 1939.  If the United States was trying to stop the Soviets from advancing, why on Earth would they HELP them by opening up a second front with Germany?!


In 1941, the US did not know who was going to win the war. German victory was possible. In order to make sure that whoever wins will be at their weakest, they supported the losing side in order to bleed the other. That is why they provided help to the Soviets.


While this makes sense in theory, reality is that in 1941 the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and the Germans declared war on the US shortly after.  At that point, the US could only join the war on one side.

Quote
Quote
The important part of what I wrote is not the satellite buffer zone part - it's the oppressive regime part.  The OP said the Soviets were fighting for freedom.  Sorry, just not the case.  They were fighting for oppression, because it's better to be oppressed than dead.


The Soviets were fighting for freedom from German oppression. If Stalin twisted that after the war it does not change the fact that the Soviets were still fighting for freedom at the time. Yes, from a retrospective point of view a weak argument could be made that the Soviets were somehow fighting for "oppression" but again, no one thought like that at the time except maybe Stalin.

Quote
Exactly!  They weren't fighting for freedom... that's the only point I'm trying to make.  The Soviets weren't fighting for freedom at all.  In fact, they made a pact with Hitler agreeing not to fight just so they could get a little piece of Poland.  The OP is full of it.


The Soviets made a pact with Hitler after coming back from discussions with the Western powers and realizing that they were completely disinterested in actually stopping Hitler. Stalin wasn't going to dick around, his country's security was at stake and if that meant taking half of Poland to act as a buffer state...so be it.


I don't deny that a buffer state was very useful for the USSR, but here's the thing - the OP is making the Soviets out to have fought valiantly for freedom.

"Today we are about to play a Game mod created by Germans, Americans, British and other people... thats freedom, and today there is freedom because million of Soviets died in the past fighting for this freedom ,they deserve respect."

The facts are that they didn't want to fight, and they didn't give a shit about freedom.

Quote
Quote
So the US should have waited for German boots to hit American soil?  Then they would have been justified?


Uhh no..I was just explaining to you that it's much easier for a soldier to understand a concept such as fighting for your existence than it is for one to understand interventionism.


Actually, here's what you said.

"In any event, whatever reason the Soviets had for fighting was way more justifiable than the reason Americans had for fighting."

What I'm saying is that eventually the US would have had to fight for its existence as well.  The British were the last major power standing between Nazi Germany and the United States, and London was in bad shape.

Every time the Allies would appease Hitler, he would take a little more, and a little more, and a little more... the US wasn't going to sit around and wait for Hitler to set his sights on North America.  He'd already crippled all the US's major western trading partners and U-boats were in the Atlantic.  That's more than enough justification.

The Soviet Union was "way more justified" than the US in the sense that Bill Gates is "way richer" than Warren Buffet.

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 10:24 PM by pnoozi

#28148

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

I don't know what to tell you, the results speak for themselves.

Yep, the result - over 20 mil soviets dead - once again, Soviets won by numbers; Sorry, but I will never say anything good about soviet officers. For me they're just scum.

------------------------------------------------------------

The Soviets were fighting for freedom from German oppression.

Unfortunately, you brought "your" freedom to Poland as well.

Forum post image
Forum post image

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 10:50 PM by spanishfly

#28150

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Quote
Well, Hitler's decision didn't bring about a major loss for the Soviet army, and considering he went against the strong advice of his generals, I'd consider that his fault.  Hitler is notorious for his shortcomings as a military commander.  Not Stalin...


I think we both agree that it was Hitler's fault. You however are implying that it was pretty much because of this fault that enabled the Soviets to win - which is obviously wrong.

My point still stands. If Hitler was such a bad tactician, maybe Germany shouldn't have attacked the Soviet Union. You can't half-ass an attack against the Soviets, fail, then say "But it was Hitler's fault that the Soviets won!". If Hitler wanted to play hard ball with Stalin then he should have been better prepared.

Quote
They were a disorganized mess in 1941 and the Battle of Stalingrad, the turning point of the war, was in 1942.  So they went from disorganized mess to elite fighting force in one year?


No, they matured into a professional army during the four years they fought the Germans. Winning one battle, even if it was the turning point, doesn't mean you have a professional army.

Quote
The deep-seeded fear of communism in the United States didn't take hold until after World War II.  Americans wouldn't have elected Roosevelt (see the New Deal) otherwise.

http://www.ushistory.org/us/49e.asp

"The Great Depression created an environment where the federal government accepted responsibility for curing a wide array of society's ills previously left to individuals, states, and local governments. This amount of regulation and involvement requires a vast upgrading of the government bureaucracy. An armada of government bureaus and regulatory agencies was erected to service the programs of the New Deal."


What Americans thought about the Soviet Union didn't mean anything. Whoever was in power called the shots, not the American people, and if those in power decide that the Soviets are a potential threat to their interests then they will do whatever it takes to weaken them.

This isn't some weird theory that I thought of..I'm surprised you're taken aback by this. This kind of political dancing has been going on throughout history - it's just the way the world works at the nation state level.

Quote
While this makes sense in theory, reality is that in 1941 the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and the Germans declared war on the US shortly after.  At that point, the US could only join the war on one side.


That's right. However being on the side of the Allies doesn't mean you can't weaken the Soviets. I'm not saying the Americans, British or anyone else had a priority in making sure that the Soviet Union was destroyed - they just wanted to be the top dog standing after the war was over. This is normal, so don't be surprised if you find out that the Americans were secretly undermining Soviet efforts...the Soviets were doing the same, and so were the British - it's just the nature of the game.

Quote
I don't deny that a buffer state was very useful for the USSR, but here's the thing - the OP is making the Soviets out to have fought valiantly for freedom.

"Today we are about to play a Game mod created by Germans, Americans, British and other people... thats freedom, and today there is freedom because million of Soviets died in the past fighting for this freedom ,they deserve respect."

The facts are that they didn't want to fight, and they didn't give a shit about freedom.


Putting aside the fact that what you said is incredibly disrespectful and you are by no means an authority of any kind regarding what Soviet soldiers fought for - the OP's statement is true...Just like it is true that the Americans fought valiantly for freedom and anyone else fighting on the Allied side. Soviet soldiers fought for freedom from Nazi oppression. Let me reiterate - the fact that Stalin turned Eastern Europe into a series of oppressed states does not in any way diminish the valiant cause for which Soviet soldiers fought for. The United States fought in Korea and established a brutal dictatorship in the south - does that diminish the bravery and sacrifice of US soldiers that fought there? No. So you see how your argument falls flat on its face.

Quote
What I'm saying is that eventually the US would have had to fight for its existence as well.  The British were the last major power standing between Nazi Germany and the United States, and London was in bad shape.

Every time the Allies would appease Hitler, he would take a little more, and a little more, and a little more... the US wasn't going to sit around and wait for Hitler to set his sights on North America.  He'd already crippled all the US's major western trading partners and U-boats were in the Gulf of Mexico.  That's more than enough justification.

The Soviet Union was "way more justified" than the US in the sense that Bill Gates is "way richer" than Warren Buffet.


Fighting for your people's existence right now is a lot more tangible than fighting a perceived threat at some point in the future. Besides, Hitler wasn't going to starve Americans to death and submerge Washington D.C. under a lake - my point still stands.

Post Merge: [time]1266288681[/time]

spanishfly wrote:
I don't know what to tell you, the results speak for themselves.

Yep, the result - over 20 mil soviets dead - once again, Soviets won by numbers; Sorry, but I will never say anything good about soviet officers. For me they're just scum.


Fair enough - I'm not going to bend over backwards to convince you, I've already written enough responses to your one-liners. I have plenty of Polish friends who aren't as close-minded as you so whatever.
Forum post image

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 10:56 PM by thebomb

#28155

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Fair enough - I'm not going to bend over backwards to convince you, I've already written enough responses to your one-liners. I have plenty of Polish friends who aren't as close-minded as you so whatever.

Man really? Sorry but you're opinion matters so much for me, that I cannot stand your rejection...

You know what? And I have many Russian friends who do not ask me to glorify their heroes. If for you it was a well-organised bunch of superheroes and so be it. Do I force you to pay your respect to the polish heroes who defeated Russian Army in 1920? No I don't.

So tell me, why am I close-minded? Because I disagree with you? You said that Soviet Army was a professional army. But still - sorry it wasn't. It was well organised - I must agree, victories did not come from nothing. But man - calling Soviet soldiers professionals, just because they knew how to kill is a mistake. For me the meaning of "professional army" is something more than just effectivness on the battlefield.

People - from now on, we can say only good things about the Soviet Army, because "thebomb" said so.

I'll start - thank you, Soviet Army, for bringing never-ending peace to my country. I'm glad that you saved me from the German oppression.

And now for serious - thanks to all Soviet soldiers who fought, believing that they are bringing freedom.
Forum post image
Forum post image

Last edited February 17, 2010 at 11:19 PM by spanishfly

#28163

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

thebomb wrote:
Quote
I don't deny that a buffer state was very useful for the USSR, but here's the thing - the OP is making the Soviets out to have fought valiantly for freedom.

"Today we are about to play a Game mod created by Germans, Americans, British and other people... thats freedom, and today there is freedom because million of Soviets died in the past fighting for this freedom ,they deserve respect."

The facts are that they didn't want to fight, and they didn't give a shit about freedom.


Putting aside the fact that what you said is incredibly disrespectful and you are by no means an authority of any kind regarding what Soviet soldiers fought for - the OP's statement is true...Just like it is true that the Americans fought valiantly for freedom and anyone else fighting on the Allied side. Soviet soldiers fought for freedom from Nazi oppression. Let me reiterate - the fact that Stalin turned Eastern Europe into a series of oppressed states does not in any way diminish the valiant cause for which Soviet soldiers fought for. The United States fought in Korea and established a brutal dictatorship in the south - does that diminish the bravery and sacrifice of US soldiers that fought there? No. So you see how your argument falls flat on its face.


I don't mean to disrespect the men who fought and died defending their country from the Nazis.  That's certainly respectable.

But if the commander for whom you're fighting doesn't believe in freedom, I'm sorry - you're just not fighting for freedom.
#28213

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

pnoozi wrote:
But if the commander for whom you're fighting doesn't believe in freedom, I'm sorry - you're just not fighting for freedom.


That doesn't make any sense - what does one's commander have to do with anything?
Forum post image
#28214

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

thebomb wrote:
pnoozi wrote:
But if the commander for whom you're fighting doesn't believe in freedom, I'm sorry - you're just not fighting for freedom.


That doesn't make any sense - what does one's commander have to do with anything?


Replace the word commander with the word entity.  That might make more sense.

If the entity for which you're fighting doesn't believe in freedom, I'm sorry - you're just not fighting for freedom.
#28218

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

pnoozi wrote:
thebomb wrote:
pnoozi wrote:
But if the commander for whom you're fighting doesn't believe in freedom, I'm sorry - you're just not fighting for freedom.


That doesn't make any sense - what does one's commander have to do with anything?


Replace the word commander with the word entity.  That might make more sense.

If the entity for which you're fighting doesn't believe in freedom, I'm sorry - you're just not fighting for freedom.


If what you say is true then the United States wasn't fighting for freedom either, nor the French nor Great Britain - right? The United States still held sovereignty over the Philippines, the British and French had various colonies all over Africa and the Middle East. You certainly don't believe in freedom if you're a colonial empire.

By your standard of what qualifies as "fighting for freedom", soldiers fighting for these "entities" wouldn't make the cut. If you do a thorough examination, you'll discover that no soldiers fighting for any state genuinely fought for freedom. Yet people would still say that US, British, and Soviet soldiers fought for a form of freedom because what matters isn't whether the state that they served believed in freedom but the actions of the soldiers as a whole.

Soldiers from the Western powers liberated Western Europe from Nazi oppression. Soldiers from the Soviet Union liberated Eastern Europe from Nazi oppression. The fact that each of those powers turned parts of the world into brutal and oppressive regimes after the war does not diminish the quest for freedom that each soldier sought after on the battlefield. That is why US, British, French and Soviet soldiers all fought for freedom.
Forum post image

Last edited February 18, 2010 at 10:50 PM by thebomb

#28226

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

thebomb wrote:
pnoozi wrote:
thebomb wrote:
pnoozi wrote:
But if the commander for whom you're fighting doesn't believe in freedom, I'm sorry - you're just not fighting for freedom.


That doesn't make any sense - what does one's commander have to do with anything?


Replace the word commander with the word entity.  That might make more sense.

If the entity for which you're fighting doesn't believe in freedom, I'm sorry - you're just not fighting for freedom.


If what you say is true then the United States wasn't fighting for freedom either, nor the French nor Great Britain - right? The United States still held sovereignty over the Philippines, the British and French had various colonies all over Africa and the Middle East. You certainly don't believe in freedom if you're a colonial empire.

By your standard of what qualifies as "fighting for freedom", soldiers fighting for these "entities" wouldn't make the cut. If you do a thorough examination, you'll discover that no soldiers fighting for any state genuinely fought for freedom. Yet people would still say that US, British, and Soviet soldiers fought for a form of freedom because what matters isn't whether the state that they served believed in freedom but the actions of the soldiers as a whole.

Soldiers from the Western powers liberated Western Europe from Nazi oppression. Soldiers from the Soviet Union liberated Eastern Europe from Nazi oppression. The fact that each of those powers turned parts of the world into brutal and oppressive regimes after the war does not diminish the quest for freedom that each soldier sought after on the battlefield. That is why US, British, French and Soviet soldiers all fought for freedom.


The Americans and British were absolutely fighting for freedom within the context of Europe, and the Soviets were definitely not fighting for any kind of freedom.  Whatever their personal feelings, the facts are that they were fighting off one horrific dictatorship in support of another, even if they didn't support Stalin.

And before you say "they had no means of standing up to Stalin" - fine, I agree.  But consider this.  I don't have the means to win a gold medal at the Olympics.  It's not my fault, but I don't go around claiming I deserve a gold medal.

I'm just saying, don't make stuff up because the truth hurts too much.  Accept it.  The Soviets fought for Stalin.  Whether they had a choice or not, reality is that they did.  If the Germans had collectively stood up to Hitler and the Russians had collectively stood up to Stalin, that would have been fighting for freedom.

If I ship off tomorrow to Afghanistan or Iraq, I can say I'm fighting for green energy or universal health care or purple teletubbies... the fact remains that I'm not fighting for any of those things.  I'm fighting for the REAL purpose of the mission.  My own feelings are inconsequential if they're not a part of the big picture.

Last edited February 19, 2010 at 1:05 AM by pnoozi

#28232

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Quote
The Americans and British were absolutely fighting for freedom within the context of Europe, and the Soviets were definitely not fighting for any kind of freedom.  Whatever their personal feelings, the facts are that they were fighting off one horrific dictatorship in support of another, even if they didn't support Stalin.


What do you mean "in the context of Europe"? Either the Soviets, Americans and British all fought for freedom or they did not. You can't fight for freedom in Europe while oppressing the Filipino people in Asia. Either you fight for freedom everywhere or you aren't fighting for freedom. And you're right, Soviet soldiers did not support Stalin because they hated him.

Quote
And before you say "they had no means of standing up to Stalin" - fine, I agree.  But consider this.  I don't have the means to win a gold medal at the Olympics.  It's not my fault, but I don't go around claiming I deserve a gold medal.


What you say would be true if "standing up to Stalin" was the only measure that determined whether you fought for freedom or not. Soviet soldiers did more than enough to qualify for fighting for freedom in the same way (if not more) than American or British soldiers. It would be an extreme act of hypocrisy if the Americans and British qualified as freedom fighters while having colonies all over the world but not Soviet soldiers.

Quote
I'm just saying, don't make stuff up because the truth hurts too much.  Accept it.  The Soviets fought for Stalin.  Whether they had a choice or not, reality is that they did.  If the Germans had collectively stood up to Hitler and the Russians had collectively stood up to Stalin, that would have been fighting for freedom.


Soviet soldiers certainly did not fight for Stalin. Ask any WWII vet and they will tell you that Stalin wasn't even on the radar. On the contrary, Stalin didn't WANT Soviet soldiers to fight for him because he knew that most of them hated him. That's why he went with what his soldiers wanted to fight for which was patriotism and freedom from Nazi oppression.

Quote
If I ship off tomorrow to Afghanistan or Iraq, I can say I'm fighting for green energy or universal health care or purple teletubbies... the fact remains that I'm not fighting for any of those things.  I'm fighting for the REAL purpose of the mission.  My own feelings are inconsequential if they're not a part of the big picture.


I'd argue that a soldier's feelings and reasons for fighting are the only ones that matter. The "big picture" is set by people like Bush, Blair, Stalin and Hitler who have a vested interest in the war but aren't willing to fight it themselves or send their children to fight it. You've got to understand that all soldiers are human beings, whether they are American, British or Soviet - and under the right circumstances (like those of WII) they all can fight for the same kind of freedom.
Forum post image

Last edited February 19, 2010 at 2:49 AM by thebomb

#28933

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

spanishfly wrote:
The moment Polish government would allow the Soviet Army to enter Poland - it would be the end of freedom in Poland.


This is it. But a question can be: was it good for Poland to have freedom? or was it health-giving for the entire Europe?
Buffer countries (no offense) sometimes play dubious roles.
this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Suvorov
has some genuine ideas regarding the beginning of the WWII. though those ideas cannot be either proved or disputed as we have NO trustworthy info on what was really going on back then. and not only the ex-iron curtain will declassify the least important doc's in 10-20 years only (if they ever will...) but the same applies to the Allies. so the number of assumption may go up to the clouds, easily.

As for me, I think that nobody should thank the USSR. But they made 80% of the deal in Europe. But that's not a matter of thanking or not thanking. Just poor buffer countries left in ruins...

P.S.
Today I saw a "demotivator" and even saved a copy. Stalin's portrait). "He took over a country with ploughs and left it having A-bombs. But he is mentioned in respect of mass repressions mainly."
Should "the 1/6 of dry land" thank him? that is the question. whether 'tis nobler. in the mind. to suffer.
(c)

Last edited February 26, 2010 at 4:01 PM by greyreth

#28940

Re: Thank you USSR (A little about history)

Forum post image

Last edited February 26, 2010 at 4:32 PM by huggy