EFEastern Front Forum Archive
Read-only public archive · no login or tracking

Archived topic · 13 posts

Please remake the SU-100!

Red Army Suggestions

Archived poll

What is your opinion about SU-100?

Good counter to axis heavy armor9 votes · 56%
Useless tank hunter7 votes · 44%

16 total votes

#142833

Please remake the SU-100!

Hello EF-team!
I know you are working very hard on Ostheer but could you add the SU-100 again, please?
It would be really great to have it as an upgrade for the SU-85!
Maybe it could be reward unit for IS-2. Would be nice to have this axis armor counter beast!  ;D
#142835

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

It's like a Hetzer, but worse.  More like a stug, but since axis has good AT with penetration the armor doesn't really do much at all.
My personal favorite
#142839

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

No
Não se apresse em perdoar. A misericórdia também corrompe.
(Nelson Rodrigues)
#143068

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

As much as I loved the SU-100, and it being one of my favourite tank destroyers of all time AND it really pained me when it went, it wasn't fitting very well into the Soviet faction. It was simply too good for it's price, and as it was it pretty much did the same as the IS-2 or what the KV-85 did at a point.
#146016

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

Let it's price be the "balancer". We do have shit like ostwind in this game, then why not have SU-100 which saw much wider usage? It looks awesome as well.
#146024

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

Looks like you didn't even read the thread before performing necromancy. The reasons stated are pretty sound. Ostwind functions as an anti-infantry tank, and therefore has a place already. SU-100 is an assault gun/tank destroyer like the SU-76 and SU-85 but is just better than both. The only way it fits is as a gun upgrade for SU-85 but this would probably ruin too much balance.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.
#146034

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

GodlikeDennis wrote:
Looks like you didn't even read the thread before performing necromancy. The reasons stated are pretty sound. Ostwind functions as an anti-infantry tank, and therefore has a place already. SU-100 is an assault gun/tank destroyer like the SU-76 and SU-85 but is just better than both. The only way it fits is as a gun upgrade for SU-85 but this would probably ruin too much balance.


i agree with dennis here
atm there are no plans to readd the su100 because it would break the current balance too much

Forum post image
#146053

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

Oh yeah, I didn't read the thread, big deal. I am saying let price be the balancer. Is jagdpanther OP? Is KT OP? It doesn't even realistically need that much armor on it.

Last edited April 23, 2013 at 6:14 PM by anakond

#146055

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

tbh the jagdpanther is OP because it can have more HP then kingtiger, is faster and has the same damage :P

Forum post image
#146064

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

Considering when it comes and the types of units it is supposed to be dealing with, jagd is one of the most useless units.
#146083

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

anakond wrote:
Considering when it comes and the types of units it is supposed to be dealing with, jagd is one of the most useless units.


I disagree. I've won matches purely thanks to the Jagdpanther saving me late game.
#146089

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

Dot.Shadow wrote:
anakond wrote:
Considering when it comes and the types of units it is supposed to be dealing with, jagd is one of the most useless units.


I disagree. I've won matches purely thanks to the Jagdpanther saving me late game.


Yes, it's not useless at all.
I identify as a four-eyed bird man. /s
#148082

Re: Please remake the SU-100!

SU-100 to replace IS-3