EFEastern Front Forum Archive
Read-only public archive · no login or tracking

Locked topic · 19 posts

Lend and Lease Act

Suggestions

#8222

Lend and Lease Act

Hey are getting the Sovjets some Shermans of the Lend and Lease Act?

And are getting the germans some caputered T-34?
#8223

Re: Lend and Lease Act

Prometheus wrote:
Hey are getting the Sovjets some Shermans of the Lend and Lease Act?

And are getting the germans some caputered T-34?


1. no
2. no - or maybe, as a doc-unit
Forum post image
#25963

Re: Lend and Lease Act

I would love to see a captured T-34 for the Germans
#28725

Re: Lend and Lease Act

Who wouldn't take a free tank if it works?
Forum post image
Relic, the all powerful god of history and physics which can be bent to their every whim!!
Relic name: SauerKRAUTSHD
#28991

Re: Lend and Lease Act

Lend-Lease as a doctrine would be kinda cool. AT Teams with Bazookas, Call-in Shermans, etc.
#29028

Re: Lend and Lease Act

I am not sure if the soviets ever got ahold of zooks but that part of the mod is done anyway they are not gonna change it...
Forum post image
Relic, the all powerful god of history and physics which can be bent to their every whim!!
Relic name: SauerKRAUTSHD
#29118

Re: Lend and Lease Act

I have always been strongly opposed to any Lend-Lease ideas. I always wanted our Soviet faction to feel distinctly Soviet - and part of that was by not simply copy-pasting things from the American faction.
Forum post image
#29134

Re: Lend and Lease Act


MrScruffs is at the start of this thread :(
So many emotions :(

You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity
#29224

Re: Lend and Lease Act

Lend lease stuff are cool as long as they're not the stuff already used by other factions.

Eg. The British built Valentine tank was used by the soviets in large numbers(over 2000 of them) and was very popular with its crews. It was also quite effective.

M3A1 scout car was also used in large numbers.

Also there is no point of using Lend lease stuff when you have the soviet equivalents. Not balance or game terms
anyways. Eg why have churchill when you can put it a KV1?
R.I.P MrScruff - A genuine Good Guy and great artist
R.I.P Loran Korn - A very brave and talented guy
RAP NEWS http://thejuicemedia.com/?ref=nf
#29257

Re: Lend and Lease Act

I figured the idea would be that since they were given to you, and not made, you could call them in from off-map if you couldn't spare the resources to make your own.
#29273

Re: Lend and Lease Act

Zerstörer wrote:
Also there is no point of using Lend lease stuff when you have the soviet equivalents. Not balance or game terms
anyways. Eg why have churchill when you can put it a KV1?


I would rather the KV1, it could damage a panther -_-
Forum post image
#29281

Re: Lend and Lease Act

actually the 76mm F32 on the KV1 was even worse aganist armor then the 6 pdr on the churchill, so no, it probably couldnt.

in real life maybe from the side or rear but from front, lol no.
#29286

Re: Lend and Lease Act

guynumber7 wrote:
actually the 76mm F32 on the KV1 was even worse aganist armor then the 6 pdr on the churchill, so no, it probably couldnt.

in real life maybe from the side or rear but from front, lol no.

Churchills/Cromwells 75mm OQF was also even worse aganist armor then 6lbs.
There were prototype T-34 tanks with Zis-2 guns (57mm) for better armor penetration.
Forum post image
#29323

Re: Lend and Lease Act

KV1 had the same gun as T34/76 and couldn't take on the heavies...same with the Churchill.
you can get a KV85 with AP rounds and then maybe...but once again...what's the point when you can get the T34/85

Similar with the T34/57...(its not a prototype btw about 250 where built and used)...why have it when you have the T34/85 upgrade which does the dame thing but even better plus the SUs which are tank hunters
R.I.P MrScruff - A genuine Good Guy and great artist
R.I.P Loran Korn - A very brave and talented guy
RAP NEWS http://thejuicemedia.com/?ref=nf
#29332

Re: Lend and Lease Act

I was stating the sad fact that the Churchill shells bounce of the Panther's ass and doesn't do any damage at all...
Forum post image
#29335

Re: Lend and Lease Act

Zerstörer wrote:
KV1 had the same gun as T34/76 and couldn't take on the heavies...same with the Churchill.
you can get a KV85 with AP rounds and then maybe...but once again...what's the point when you can get the T34/85

Similar with the T34/57...(its not a prototype btw about 250 where built and used)...why have it when you have the T34/85 upgrade which does the dame thing but even better plus the SUs which are tank hunters

Dont want a T-34/57. Just saing that 57mm was better at killing tanks than the early 75mm and 3inch guns.
#29361

Re: Lend and Lease Act

Yeah the T34/57 was in men of war and was better then both the F32 and F34.

but KV1 had the same gun as early T34, F32, and idk if it was ever upgraded to F34 in KV1.