EFEastern Front Forum Archive
Read-only public archive · no login or tracking

Archived topic · 7 posts

[vCoH] stealthattack(no doctrine) vs afaruk(royal commandoes support)

Eastern Front Replays

#109315

[vCoH] stealthattack(no doctrine) vs afaruk(royal commandoes support)


Semois 2p replay

victory point game where brits sucsessfully blockaded fuel point near whermacht base but let the rest of the map go because of it.

just a replay that i though i would submit to hopefully get some advice. not very high level, but still interesting.

gamereplays link http://www.gamereplays.org/companyofheroes/replays.php?game=25&show=details&id=254558#/replay_overview
Forum post image

Sommarkatze wrote:
OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Last edited February 17, 2012 at 11:13 PM by stealthattack1

#109331

Re: [vCoH] stealthattack(no doctrine) vs afaruk(royal commandoes support)

It helps to describe what happened in your game ;). VP or annihilate? What factions? How long? Good game? Map? Descriptions are always better ;)
Forum post image
Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Last edited February 17, 2012 at 11:10 PM by Trannyhunterx

#109333

Re: [vCoH] stealthattack(no doctrine) vs afaruk(royal commandoes support)

alright then. will do. thanks for the advice! ;D
Forum post image

Sommarkatze wrote:
OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?
#109337

Re: [vCoH] stealthattack(no doctrine) vs afaruk(royal commandoes support)

Replay dont work for me :(. Its just says sync error :P
Forum post image
Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"
#109345

Re: [vCoH] stealthattack(no doctrine) vs afaruk(royal commandoes support)

hmm. i dont know what to say.
Forum post image

Sommarkatze wrote:
OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?
#109357

Re: [vCoH] stealthattack(no doctrine) vs afaruk(royal commandoes support)

It's a vCoH replay right?

I don't like when people ignore the +10MU next to your base on Semois. It puts you at a disadvantage for no reason. Especially against Brits, you will want munis for flamers.

Pios don't beat brens :P

vs Emplacement spam is when you really need to just spam either pios or shrek grens. If you'd loaded 3 pios into your HT and gone around the back of that MG at the cutoff, you could've cut him off VERY easily.

You floated a fair amount of resources. Mines are devastating on Semois. Spam them. You needed a lot more grens and pios too. Paks aren't that great on Semois because there is a lot of shot blocking objects. Paks are also pretty bad against Stuarts and emplacements. Shreks are much more effective.

Going for an Ost was the right move but I noticed you were building a P4 at the end. You shouldn't have done this because you saw the Brit had built a Stag and was clearly going for FFs which dominate P4s. Better to build more Osts and have Paks/Shrek grens protect them.

If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Last edited February 18, 2012 at 4:16 AM by GodlikeDennis

#109385

Re: [vCoH] stealthattack(no doctrine) vs afaruk(royal commandoes support)

thanks a lot man, this is exactly what i wanted! i appreciate your advice!

sidenote, i was presumably not watching the pios at that point. :-[ ??? just gotta watch my units, especially when i queue up all those capping orders.
Forum post image

Sommarkatze wrote:
OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?