Unit Page

As the new patch is coming, I think EF homepage is pretty barren...
Why don't we make something like unit page that Modern Combat and official CoH web have?
Though of course as long as it doesn't hinder the coming of the new patch... :P

Im sorry if this sounds dumb but what is a unit page ???

No and yes

Fishhunterx wrote:
Im sorry if this sounds dumb but what is a unit page ???

this is a unit guide :D
http://www.companyofheroes.com/units/allies/infantry/Engineers
its the original of relic

I would imagine there would be a "unit guide" like list when the tutorial comes out.

But then again we could always make 2 seperate projects. Tutorial and Unit guide :P

Lolz

I Lol'd

if you would know what we know then you would know its now a good time to say lol

evilSpike wrote:
if you would know what we know then you would know its now a good time to say lol

LOL (I dont know why Im saying lol :P). I would Iimagine that a unit page has either already been made or has been rejected. That why there are 1 word LOL post :P

LOL  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Err...
Lol? ??? ???
Anyway, thanks for the replies... :P

My wrote:
Anyway, thanks for the replies... :P

This actually made me LOL

GodlikeDennis wrote:
Lolz

Very intuitive XD

@Myname is ante: Im sure you'll find out what they're talking about soon  ;)

Fishhunterx wrote:

evilSpike wrote:
if you would know what we know then you would know its now a good time to say lol

LOL (I dont know why Im saying lol :P). I would Iimagine that a unit page has either already been made or has been rejected. That why there are 1 word LOL post :P

one of these things is right :D
which one? i dont tell...  :P

evilSpike wrote:

Fishhunterx wrote:

evilSpike wrote:
if you would know what we know then you would know its now a good time to say lol

LOL (I dont know why Im saying lol :P). I would Iimagine that a unit page has either already been made or has been rejected. That why there are 1 word LOL post :P

one of these things is right :D
which one? i dont tell...  :P

Maybe they are both right? Or maybe one is right and one is wrong indirectly? Or maybe one is right indirectly?

You'll have to wait and see ;)

Last edited January 22, 2012 at 1:13 AM by Cranialwizard

Cranialwizard wrote:

evilSpike wrote:
Maybe they are both right? Or maybe one is right and one is wrong indirectly? Or maybe one is right indirectly?

You'll have to wait and see ;)


one of these things is right :D
which one? i dont tell...  :P

So many tricks and flicks XD. I'll just wait and see :P. I'll only get more confused :P

I guess it's under construction.



LOL

(Why I typed that, I'll never know)

Cranialwizard wrote:
I Lol'd

you seem to have lol'd again. Maybe you're upbringing explains your rash personality as well as senselessly locking topics to avoid further conflicts and stating things which other people who don't check the forums 24/7 may have overlooked.

First of all, no need to be sassy or critical. Infact I shouldn't even have to explain to you why I laughed, nor as to why I spend free time on the forums. I don't believe I have a rash sense of personality, I just don't tolerate bullshit. And I wouldn't expect an average user to identify my current situation.
Second of all I do not have the power as balancer to lock or delete topics that are not created by me. That's not my job.
Third of all you may have noticed multiple balancers laughing or lolling. Perhaps it is because we know something you don't.

Don't get all up in my case because we don't want to tell you what's going on in the internal form. If you want to see it, donate some time as a balancer, dev, or artist. Otherwise quit turning your issues around to make it seem like I'm the cause of a problem.

Last edited January 25, 2012 at 11:59 PM by Cranialwizard

I don't really see how you reacted that way specifically to Crani. Several of us also laughed. You should be happy that we are clearly working on something similar, along with other things, for the new patch.

Crani and all the devs/balancers have spent an enormous amount of time working hard so you can enjoy this game. I would be more thankful if I were you.

Last edited January 26, 2012 at 12:52 AM by GodlikeDennis

bopokippo wrote:

Cranialwizard wrote:
I Lol'd

you seem to have lol'd again. Maybe you're upbringing explains your rash personality as well as senselessly locking topics to avoid further conflicts and stating things which other people who don't check the forums 24/7 may have overlooked.

Thats kinda harsh and uncalled for  :-\. No need to bring family into this. If you had read further you'll see that evilSpike implies that a unit page is being made, quite possibly to be released soon (although I have nothing to support this claim). Cranial isn't even the one who first  "lol'd". It was GLD. Was a simple "lol" very helpful? Probably not. But oh well, thats life. And most topics these days are locked b/c the OP has had their question answered :P. Simple as that. Thats why your previous topic was locked

The devs and the balancers really are not obligated to tell you anything. We should just be happy they sneak us bits of info every now and then. You should be even more grateful that this dev team and this balance team actually listens to complaints and concerns (although they dont always agree or comply :P)

Oh and b/c I've always wanted to use this picturre ;D

Last edited January 26, 2012 at 1:05 AM by Fishhunterx

Chill out dudes... remember that we are always watching you ;D... Yes, we will try to finish that section before we release the patch, it is almost done. Although it is not going to have the strenght of the weapon.


@bopokippo
As it seems, your topic was locked because Cranial explained properly why it could be locked, besides he already posted the topic where this discussion was being held. So, better to drop these quarrels, it isn't a good example for children ;).

blackbishop wrote:
Chill out dudes... remember that we are always watching you ;D...

You are correct. Everyone Back On topic and pretend this never happened :P

blackbishop wrote:
Yes, we will try to finish that section before we release the patch, it is almost done. Although it is not going to have the strenght of the weapon.

Ohhhh. Sounds interesting :P. Are you releasing data (IIRC its called a Corsix ???) Or are you giving us abitrary numbers (like TH is a 3 vs Tanks while a T-34 is a 5; something like that)? I think for noobs, a rating system is easier :P

Fishhunterx wrote:

bopokippo wrote:

Cranialwizard wrote:
I Lol'd

you seem to have lol'd again. Maybe you're upbringing explains your rash personality as well as senselessly locking topics to avoid further conflicts and stating things which other people who don't check the forums 24/7 may have overlooked.

Thats kinda harsh and uncalled for  :-\. No need to bring family into this. If you had read further you'll see that evilSpike implies that a unit page is being made, quite possibly to be released soon (although I have nothing to support this claim). Cranial isn't even the one who first  "lol'd". It was GLD. Was a simple "lol" very helpful? Probably not. But oh well, thats life. And most topics these days are locked b/c the OP has had their question answered :P. Simple as that. Thats why your previous topic was locked

The devs and the balancers really are not obligated to tell you anything. We should just be happy they sneak us bits of info every now and then. You should be even more grateful that this dev team and this balance team actually listens to complaints and concerns (although they dont always agree or comply :P)

Oh and b/c I've always wanted to use this picturre ;D

Yeah I know it was hinted. But Cranial has a very condescending manner of approaching the oblivousness of many others in certain areas and certainly does it more often than others I ever so often see. For instance, he noted in a suggestion topic that the 1.6 version had already fixed the said problem in the suggestion... and yet already acted in offense or a downgrading demeanor to the other even though those not with his version of the game clearly do not have access to what he has access to. Same here. Why "lol" when the hint was placed at the end. Same with my topic. Its quite clear that I was a buffoon and overlooked this topic, and yet, a simple response like "lol" was clearly not intelligent in any way, shape, or form. An elaboration and kind method of bringing about the knowledge would be more like it. His personal text and profile pic only further augment his image to myself. Maybe I take more offense to such a response than others, but I would not like asking questions and getting laughed at in my own confusion and still... for no good reason.

^
posted before the post above me came*

And I admit I may have been quick to commit the first offense as I may have been too quick to assume some things, but people know themselves well, and other people often do not. If for the first direct response I really get from someone who I don't really know is a "lol" that doesn't suit well with me for first impressions... and anyways, I couldn't tell what type of "lol" it was. Once again, too ambiguous in the response.

Such is the internet. If I were you, I wouldn't take ANYTHING said on here offensively. Who cares what somebody half the world away at his/her computer screen writes.

Hear hear


And please add the soviet units in awesome action, not scratching their chin please.

Tankbuster wrote:
And please add the soviet units in awesome action, not scratching their chin please.

What do you mean by this :P ?

I want the conscripts to be shown assaulting a MG42 team, not standing in your HQ because they feed xp to the enemy

Oh. You mean like a cool picture :P. I think that would take some time :P

IIRC There are nice pictures.  ;D

Cranialwizard wrote:
IIRC There are nice pictures.  ;D

Will this unit page be released with 1.6 ???

Well now...I think you'll have to wait and see  ;)

Cranialwizard wrote:
Well now...I think you'll have to wait and see  ;)

Sneaky EF team ;D

Fishhunterx wrote:

Cranialwizard wrote:
IIRC There are nice pictures.  ;D

Will this unit page be released with 1.6 ???

honestly we dont know
it would be nice to release somethig, if we had something similar or exatctly like the relic unit guide or something totaly different that dosnt look like the relic version we dont have...