#9941
Archived topic · 85 posts
NEW EYE CANDY
General Discussion
#9943
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Looks good to me ;)
#9950
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
#9953
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
I'm still on the fence about the T-90 even being included in the first place... I'm in favour of replacing it with the T-60 later on since its pretty similar (chassis wise).
#9956
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Personally I think you should keep it, remember that most of the units in CoH itself are not total accurate, its all about blowing stuff up and having a good time. i cant wait till i can get control of this army and its units,
Besides whats one light AA tank between friends ;)
Besides whats one light AA tank between friends ;)
#9957
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Accurate or not, all units in CoH have at least reached production... the T-90 was cancelled before it reached production in favour of the ZSU-37.
#9996
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Well come update time maybe include the ZSU-37? Would have to have something to cover up the open turret though, unless you manage to get the guys animated.
#10005
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
ZSU-37 was late war and never saw combat either.
#10008
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Trucks? You can modify the truck to have
a quad maxim
dual dshk or
37mm gun
might be an idea?
a quad maxim
dual dshk or
37mm gun
might be an idea?
Za Chest Gvardii!
#10149
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Speaking of trucks...
Have you guys thought of a troop transport for the red army yet? or will you even have one?
maybe later on down the line?
Also about the medic truck, will it heal friendly troops, aka US and British men?
Have you guys thought of a troop transport for the red army yet? or will you even have one?
maybe later on down the line?
Also about the medic truck, will it heal friendly troops, aka US and British men?
#10150
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
#10164
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Dragon93 wrote:
Later down the line, possibly.
The initial release will not include a transport truck, and the Soviets (as far as currently planned) will never have a truck by default.
Tank Riders
T-34s can now mount Guard infantry. Or was it vice versa?
o.Ô ???

An apple a day keeps the doctor away ;)
#10166
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Mm I was wondering how the "Tank Riders" ability would work?
Have you managed to code it so that the infantry gets up and sits on the back of the tank? I've only ever seen people being able to mod infantry standing up on the back of a sherman.
Or has this not been sorted yet?
Cheers
Have you managed to code it so that the infantry gets up and sits on the back of the tank? I've only ever seen people being able to mod infantry standing up on the back of a sherman.
Or has this not been sorted yet?
Cheers
#10168
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
In one british-campaing video some tommies are sat on cromwells ...
An apple a day keeps the doctor away ;)

An apple a day keeps the doctor away ;)
#10179
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
GreenApple wrote:
In one british-campaing video some tommies are sat on cromwells ...
Well in Video, this can be achieved. much easier.
#10252
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
This would take a good amount of work for a singular feature only found in a specific branch of one doctrine.
Would be really interesting though, would make a much more mechanized army, I would assume.
I wonder if the units can take damage from outside, or be sniped off (similar to bren carrier (i think) and PE infantry halftrack).
Would be really interesting though, would make a much more mechanized army, I would assume.
I wonder if the units can take damage from outside, or be sniped off (similar to bren carrier (i think) and PE infantry halftrack).
#10319
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
#10914
Re: NEW EYE CANDY

Looks like this Panzer II is operational,
Wouldn't you say? ;)
#10926
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Apart from being a Panzer I, yes I'd say it is :P
Great work as usual from Scruff
Great work as usual from Scruff
#11024
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
FriendlyFire wrote:
Looks like this Panzer II is operational,
Wouldn't you say? ;)
I love it! ;D
#13261
Re: NEW EYE CANDY

So Devs,
What have you guys been up to lately?
#13264
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Scruffs personal work, so don't go associating it with the Ostheer just yet ;)
#13266
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
! Oh wow!!!
So those will all be in Ostheer?
Amazing, primary battle tank is Pz1, but catches up
via JagTiger :) Now I understand completely ! :D
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity
#13269
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
BurroDiablo wrote:
Scruffs personal work, so don't go associating it with the Ostheer just yet ;)
Ok, I get the picture
Still... Mr.Scruff, EPIC work, It would be a shame if these works of art of yours won't be in the Ostheer
You have lots of talent, ;)
Oh and Loupblanc don't go associating it with the Ostheer just yet
Last edited November 20, 2009 at 9:21 PM by FriendlyFire
#13271
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
FriendlyFire wrote:
So Devs,
What have you guys been up to lately?
I love the cars and the halftrack on the top right
#13281
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Jagdtiger would be amazing. Seeing that go up against an ISU-152, get a couple panthers on one side and some t-34 on the other, and we have some epic tank battles
#13283
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Jagdtiger wasn't a common tank. A maximum of 88 was produced, which means a total of 50 would be more realistic.
Over 2000 ISU 152 were produced till the end of the war.
Not to mention, that the Jagdtiger hasn't fight against the soviets besides the possible use in Wien.
Also, why should the Ostheer need a such heavy tank-destroyer ?
The Elephant/Ferdinand for OH and Jagdtiger as Reward Unit for the WH (King Tiger) or PE (Jagtpanther).
Over 2000 ISU 152 were produced till the end of the war.
Not to mention, that the Jagdtiger hasn't fight against the soviets besides the possible use in Wien.
Also, why should the Ostheer need a such heavy tank-destroyer ?
The Elephant/Ferdinand for OH and Jagdtiger as Reward Unit for the WH (King Tiger) or PE (Jagtpanther).
#13291
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
As I said, don't go associating these with the Ostheer just yet... this is Scruffs personal work, we haven't discussed including any such vehicles (Jagdtiger included) in the Ostheer.
#13387
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Maybe make ISU152 not so uber (but it MUST have short
range arty thing) lol. (It's a buffed up SU122 after all) :)
(I know SU122 is a T34, SU152 is a KV, ISU152 is an IS2)shush
... And make it possible to have 2 at once?
It would then reflect that those puppies were numerous as hell.
Thoughts?
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity
#13390
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Honestly this dead horse has been flogged so much its practically alive again...
::)
::)
#13397
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
#13400
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
* Luz777 : Dead horse, being flogged... hmm, double negative
makes a positive, then? :) Scary.
* As for McScruff not wanting his image-shack-screens posted
/viewed, bring them faster to the public! We are STARVING for
anything new. The EF:DEV's don't give us anything new to gnaw
on :p It's like they've truly given up on the Mod QQ :p
... Sounding funeral rites...
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity
#13421
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
MrScruff wrote:
please do not post/view my image-shack-screens anymore - these are my models - and i want to bring them self to public!
Alright,
Sorry for upsetting you,
That will be the last image I will ever upload. :-[
Its just... its been awhile since we've had a huge update, we on the outside can only speculate what you guys are upto, is it really time consuming to make a 3min video showing more units of the sovits in Combat, vs the german armies? Or a few more images of your work now and then? :-\
#13424
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
Quote from: MrScruff on November 23, 2009, 11:25:10 PM
please do not post/view my image-shack-screens anymore - these are my models.
He asked that we no longer view his works, at all :p
He only creates them for his own enjoyment, it seems ;)
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity
#13429
Re: NEW EYE CANDY
luz777 wrote:
Honestly this dead horse has been flogged so much its practically alive again...
::)
Agree with that. Its getting to the point where I just have to facepalm and move on.







