Remove the M1927 emplacement

Guys, i think the M1927 emplacement is not fit because there is a D-30 arty as an emplacement, and its quite disturb when i push my infantries but with the support weapon is only the mortar. So that i suggest you to make the the M1927 as a movable weapon. And you can make it as a call in weapon in propaganda doctrine- it maybe call-in along with 2 other mortars and call this battle group something like: " Infantry support group". If it is possible, can you guys make a brand new gun like the M1943 ?

Because the M1927 is quite outdate.

Are you good to animate it for make'em a movable arty?

Man, it's just a suggestion of a possibility don't need to be that cranky.

It's just a question, no need to be touchy.

As youve said Soviets have a mortar.
Germans have the 81mm tube and a Nebel becouse players usually choose between T2 and T3. Soviet mortar is cheap to get and you can choose to upgrade it. They allready have enough mobile infantry artillery.

Mr.Q wrote:
Because the M1927 is quite outdate.

As is the Hotchkiss H35, the Mosin-Nagant 1891/36 (from bloody 1891 even if it was updated), Panzer 2, T-70/90, PE Scout Car, Lee-Enfield, and a ton of other things in the game. Would also like us to remove all that?

QuoteAre you good to animate it for make'em a movable arty?

It's not possible to use the pak40 animation?

lopolopez wrote:

QuoteAre you good to animate it for make'em a movable arty?

It's not possible to use the pak40 animation?

Is there a pak40 animation or do you mean pak38?

It won't be considered cause it would be too much like the Ostheer's 7.5 cm le.IG 18

This:

Paciat wrote:
As youve said Soviets have a mortar.
Germans have the 81mm tube and a Nebel becouse players usually choose between T2 and T3. Soviet mortar is cheap to get and you can choose to upgrade it. They allready have enough mobile infantry artillery.

+

this:

neosdark wrote:
It won't be considered cause it would be too much like the Ostheer's 7.5 cm le.IG 18

The weapon can be towed but we obviously didn't want to be like that. It will remain as emplacement.

I remember something used to be in Propaganda War Strategy that was an emplacement that could be built. What was it?

irik wrote:
I remember something used to be in Propaganda War Strategy that was an emplacement that could be built. What was it?

ZIS-3 emplacement?

yes it was that. I remember fighting the axis AI on lyon. They punched through one of the bridges I was defending and they took out my m1927. They crewed it, but it wasn't in the emplacement anymore. How do you do that?

AI bug.

the zis 3 was so much more effective... this new thing is pretty  un-useful :(

neosdark wrote:
It won't be considered cause it would be too much like the Ostheer's 7.5 cm le.IG 18

Although, if the devs make the M1927 towable, i would suggest it is doctrinal call-in weapon, not buildable as the le.IS 18.

jaxjace wrote:
the zis 3 was so much more effective... this new thing is pretty  un-useful :(

useless against tanks sure. it's an infantry support gun. i notice almost everyone picks breakthrough assault strategy, not propaganda war. but it's for infantry. Naval Infantry can get two PTRD-41 AT rifles, that should make up for M1927 being an infantry gun. Zis-3 is now the soviet at gun, so what difference does it make that the new emplacement is for infantry support?

I like it (obviously since I came up with the weapon). People get frustrated when you have one of these well protected and constantly bombarding the enemy. I think it suits propaganda just fine.

I like it when the cpus think they can send in infantry to take out, or even crew, the M1927  ;D

its just not practical. what would be a good replacement is if JUST FOR PROPAGANDA you could make more than 1 artillery fire base, i remember when we could anyways.

I just removed that glitch because I got tired of tons of people reporting it and always answering thas was fine as it and was "intended" :P.