EFEastern Front Forum Archive
Read-only public archive · no login or tracking

Locked topic · 7 posts

Sub faction for the US ?

General Discussion

#84350

Sub faction for the US ?

Guys if you gave the Brits the RMC, i think you should add one to the US. My suggestion would be the airbourne division as a sub fact. The building will be remained the same but they will concentrate more on air bourne units. I would suggest that the basic infantries of the sub fact is air bourne which is build in barrack but they cant reinforce from the sky without the beacon construted by engineer. They are equipped with M1 carbine and garand then later upgrade with BARs and nade. About beacons, 3 can be constructed in the game in order to call reinforce from planes, this is available for all infantries, each will have a  range of a sector that is captured by the alliedand that beacon is deactivated when sector is lost or destroyed( i mean the beacon). And the engineers will have a simpler MG nest, it consisted of sandbags around a 30 cal, and can build AT nest, is a Tripod recoilless AT gun and sanbags surround. And HMG airbourne, mortar airbourne, snuper,  especially airborne special squad, maybe like rangers but reskinned, 5 men squad with thompsons, M1 carbine, upgrade with bazooka, M1919 LMG. Give them a 50 cal jeep would be nice.  Yawning, ill come back later it is 12 pm in my country.
Who am i?
#84353

Re: Sub faction for the US ?

The Brits got the RMC because general concensus was that the Brits are a broken faction, not just for kicks and giggles. So I don't think this idea will be implemented.
#84354

Re: Sub faction for the US ?

Tico_1990 wrote:
The Brits got the RMC because general concensus was that the Brits are a broken faction, not just for kicks and giggles. So I don't think this idea will be implemented.


That, and why would you want to waste their time to do that, the Americans aren't broken in any way and Airborne already has a representation in game.
#84355

Re: Sub faction for the US ?

@Mr.Q
I'm not gonna say that ain't going to happen(I do not take such decisions), there are a lot of new stuff I would like to see on EF for US however, currently we do not have plans to implement such thing.

We have other high priorities.
Mors Indecepta

Might controls everything, and without strength you cannot protect anything. Let alone yourself...

Last edited August 10, 2011 at 6:01 PM by blackbishop

#84356

Re: Sub faction for the US ?

I think you should change your name in MR. SUGGESTION  :P
Forum post image
#84359

Re: Sub faction for the US ?

Moonwalker wrote:
I think you should change your name in MR. SUGGESTION  :P
"Balancers are 10 a penny"
#84365

Re: Sub faction for the US ?

@Cranialwizard & @Moonwalker
Guys, that is not the topic about ::)... stay out of trouble :).

I will lock this before becomes a spamfest.
Mors Indecepta

Might controls everything, and without strength you cannot protect anything. Let alone yourself...