Shadowmetroid wrote:
The entire RMC faction is a reward unit. Therefore, no separate doctrine tree. Not that it needs one ;)
I pretty much agree with this Statement. The RMC doesn't need a separate doctrine tree. But inclusion of at least one doctrine might forward EF's development efforts.
From what I glean from Ostheer A6.0
Rizz's Aprilfools imbroglio was not such a red herring as most people think. Lots of good data in Ostheer A5.5 to chew on. We could only wish he had vetted that "mouse" crap=trap, :D with Lord Rommel first. (and the igoogle translator /dictionary is so easy to use):
http://www.google.com/webmasters/igoogle/translate.html#source=tlha&utm_campaign=en&utm_source=en-ha-na-us-sk&utm_medium=ha&utm_term=german%2Fenglish%20translatorAnyhow. I have been thinking about how the game mechanics of the doctrine trees work IE: RHT combat effective unit call-in when 4CP have been spent. The Ostheer 5.5A and 6.0A indicate Axis Minor Power Allies are being considered for use in EF. The random squad call-in concept has some merit. Only the Italians have any unique and credible AFV's, (The Romanian Tanks < Pz3j (which is the neutral
0 Ost MBT), and the proposed CP cost/buff obtained has not yet been fully thought through.
The Canadian faction thread is not really viable as a Faction, (not enough unique units to fill the roles); but: 1ssf
Can\role airbourne; ghurka
Ind\role death sqd ability: infiltration\sneak;
Filipino Scout: role\Elite inf. scout; Legion Estrangee
French?\ role: Elite CA=storm trooper ...... I'm sure you get the idea. The doctrine could be inserted in place of the intelligence doctrine. (I don't think there are enough players, sophisticated enough to appreciate or use this doctrine.
http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=5616.0;topicseenAlso Please consider:
http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=5532.msg62377#msg62377 as serious suggestions for
Axis Minor Power Allies Call-ins.
孫 The
EFv1.3.1
子 Art
ENIGMA
兵 of
Sun Tzu says: War is the way to survival or extinction.
法 War