cold-war

even if non balanced, i d like to play usa or commonwealth versus russia ? could that be fixed for fun ?  ;)

ans great work guys i own my words

haha yes George S. Patton would be RIGHT next to you. Wait no he'd be in his car yelling at his troops to go faster at the commie dirt bags

Bah, Shermans vs T-34-85's?

Patton would be pink mist before he could yell charge!

I also want a COH cold-war episode.
I even played a 2 UK vs USRR MP games (1 as UK, second as Soviets) on 1.00 ver! I just picked fraction and "what the hell?"
It would be great if there was a posibility to create this kind of games, but only if all players agreed on it.

slappyfish wrote:
Bah, Shermans vs T-34-85's?

Patton would be pink mist before he could yell charge!

No he would not complain and find a new way to fight off the commies 

ford_prefect wrote:

slappyfish wrote:
Bah, Shermans vs T-34-85's?

Patton would be pink mist before he could yell charge!

No he would not complain and find a new way to fight off the commies

M-18 would do the job. Its cheaper than a T-34.

Paciat wrote:

ford_prefect wrote:

slappyfish wrote:
Bah, Shermans vs T-34-85's?

Patton would be pink mist before he could yell charge!

No he would not complain and find a new way to fight off the commies

M-18 would do the job.

bringing a bigger tank good thinking that is a nice cheap tank. And if you have Tales of Valor what is the upgraded tank you get? I don't honestly know I stopped playing this game a while back.

i think its M10
but what Americans need is M36 slugger M10 chassis and 90mm canon same as Pershing
or the conversion version M36B1 which was M4A3 Sherman with that gun but not many was converted

the English Centurion tank is a behemoth I'd love to see a Cold War mod with England having that pretty tank :)

Centurions and Super Pershings vs. IS-3s vs. Maus. Yum.

Ost_Front_Soldat wrote:
Centurions and Super Pershings vs. IS-3s vs. Maus. Yum.

Maus would be so slow that an arti strike/bombing run would allways hit it.
But EF cant change original fractions.

We were talking about an armoured slugfest. Airstrikes can hit any tank really, the reason German heavy armour is famous for being blown up by P-51s is not simply because "they were big..." because from the pilots view a Panzer IV was not much smaller than a Tiger.

It was because a)They were priority targets, b) the Allies enjoyed almost complete airsuperiority from D-Day onwards.

Since we are already making a hypothetical tank match, let's also state that air power is irrelevent, also hypothetically.

F**k the maus. A king tiger would still maul either of those three tanks regardless.

Ost_Front_Soldat wrote:
We were talking about an armoured slugfest. Airstrikes can hit any tank really, the reason German heavy armour is famous for being blown up by P-51s is not simply because "they were big..." because from the pilots view a Panzer IV was not much smaller than a Tiger.

It was because a)They were priority targets, b) the Allies enjoyed almost complete airsuperiority from D-Day onwards.

Every tank was a priority target. Allied there were allways some fighter-bobmers in the air just waiting to be called ("Cab rank").
But also to most infantry every german tank was a tiger. Even officers didnt know much about the german armor. They just knew how to destroy it. And the easiest way was to call in the airforce.

Versedhorison wrote:
F**k the maus. A king tiger would still maul either of those three tanks regardless.

Yes it may be alittle stronger, buta king could easliy be outflanked with any other tank and kings were really expensive